2020
DOI: 10.3201/eid2607.200282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Abstract: S evere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the etiologic agent of the current rapidly growing outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), originating from the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (1). Initially, 41 cases of "pneumonia of unknown etiology" were reported to the World Health Organization by the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee at the end of December 2019 (2). On January 8, 2020, the pathogen was identified (1), and human-to-human transmission was reported soon after. By Janu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

62
1,215
10
45

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,445 publications
(1,332 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
62
1,215
10
45
Order By: Relevance
“…https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.04.20050427 doi: medRxiv preprint estimated to be between 2-3 (2-5) and were widely reported in official documents (17) and public media. These estimates are mostly based on an epidemic growth rate between 0.1 and 0.14/day (2)(3)(4)(5), which is inconsistent with many new lines of evidence and data as discussed in this paper and a previous work (6). Previously we showed that with a mean serial interval, defined as the duration of time between onset of symptoms in an index case and a secondary case, of 6-9 days (3,18) and an epidemic growth rate between 0.19-0.29/day, the value of R0 must be higher than 3 (6).…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.04.20050427 doi: medRxiv preprint estimated to be between 2-3 (2-5) and were widely reported in official documents (17) and public media. These estimates are mostly based on an epidemic growth rate between 0.1 and 0.14/day (2)(3)(4)(5), which is inconsistent with many new lines of evidence and data as discussed in this paper and a previous work (6). Previously we showed that with a mean serial interval, defined as the duration of time between onset of symptoms in an index case and a secondary case, of 6-9 days (3,18) and an epidemic growth rate between 0.19-0.29/day, the value of R0 must be higher than 3 (6).…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same framework as in Ref. 6, we find that when the growth rate is 0.19/day, the median R0 is estimated to be 4.0 (95% CI: 3.1 and 5.0); whereas when the growth rate is 0.29/day, the median R0 is estimated to be 7.1 (95% CI: 5.1 and 9.6). Although shorter serial intervals are reported in the literature (19,20), it was noted that this is likely due to strong intervention efforts (18,19).…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…rate in Italy was 0,19 per day with a doubling time close to 3.6 days in according withSanche et al (2020) who showed a growth rate of infection of COVID-19 in Wuhan, Hubei Province (China) on January 2020 close to 0.21-0.30 per day with a doubling time of 2.3-3.3[27]. The basic reproductive number (R 0 ), estimated by the researchers, was 5.7 consistently with a "super-spread event"by an airborne droplet transmission as described by Wellings and Teunis (2004) for the epidemic curves for Sever Acute Respiratory Sindrome (SARS) during the outbreak on February-June 2003 in Hong…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%