2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00306-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High cesarean section rates for pregnant medical practitioners in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK, Geary et al 1 observed that female medical doctors when pregnant often choose to deliver by elective caesarean section. Similarly, Lawrie et al 2 reported high caesarean section rates among pregnant medical practitioners in South Africa. The liberal use of caesarean section appears to reflect obstetricians' concern regarding evidence linking vaginal delivery with perineal damage and its long term sequelae such as stress incontinence and anal sphincter damage 3 -5 , whereas fear of damage to the infant plays a less significant role in lowering the threshold for caesarean section 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the UK, Geary et al 1 observed that female medical doctors when pregnant often choose to deliver by elective caesarean section. Similarly, Lawrie et al 2 reported high caesarean section rates among pregnant medical practitioners in South Africa. The liberal use of caesarean section appears to reflect obstetricians' concern regarding evidence linking vaginal delivery with perineal damage and its long term sequelae such as stress incontinence and anal sphincter damage 3 -5 , whereas fear of damage to the infant plays a less significant role in lowering the threshold for caesarean section 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the UK, Geary et al 1 observed that female medical doctors when pregnant often choose to deliver by elective caesarean section. Similarly, Lawrie et al 2 reported high caesarean section rates among pregnant medical practitioners in South Africa. The liberal use of caesarean section appears to reflect obstetricians’ concern regarding evidence linking vaginal delivery with perineal damage and its long term sequelae such as stress incontinence and anal sphincter damage 3–5 , whereas fear of damage to the infant plays a less significant role in lowering the threshold for caesarean section 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There has been considerable debate regarding the respective risks and benefits of vaginal and cesarean delivery, and whether women's preferences influence physicians' decisions about the mode of delivery. Studies from different parts of the world and among professional and nonprofessional women have shown differing preferences [1–3], and it is unlikely that preferences can be extrapolated from one group to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa, Lawrie and colleagues [1] studied pregnant physicians, one third of whom was planning an elective cesarean section. On the other hand, of the 3061 Swedish women Hildingson and colleagues [2] surveyed, only 8% said they would prefer to have a cesarean section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation