2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Vehicle Routing and Teaming with Gaussian Distributed Energy Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stochastic vehicle routing problem (SVRP) is a variation of VRP where some of the parameters in the optimization are random distributions. Previous works in the field of SVRP have investigated optimization under uncertain requests number at each POI [15][16][17][18], uncertain time costs for traveling edges or service at a POI [19][20][21][22], and uncertain energy costs [23][24][25]. This work considers the uncertainty in time costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic vehicle routing problem (SVRP) is a variation of VRP where some of the parameters in the optimization are random distributions. Previous works in the field of SVRP have investigated optimization under uncertain requests number at each POI [15][16][17][18], uncertain time costs for traveling edges or service at a POI [19][20][21][22], and uncertain energy costs [23][24][25]. This work considers the uncertainty in time costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], we dealt with a deterministic variation of such a problem, where we assumed exact information (instead of a distribution) of the agent capabilities and task requirements was known. In this work, we develop a generalizable framework for task assignment and scheduling that systematically represents heterogeneous and uncertain task requirements and agent capabilities.…”
Section: A Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement to drive these functions to 1 could be satisfied with appropriate team formation planning. In our model, this requirement can be encoded as linear constraints [16]. In this representation, the only part that could introduces nonconvexity is the logic ∨ which takes the union of two feasible regions.…”
Section: A Heterogeneous Teaming Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While heterogeneity in multi-agent teams may offer benefits, these benefits can only be understood by analyzing optimal heterogeneous team compositions and dynamically distributing tasks among agents in uncertain environments, which remain challenging. Although optimization-based MATA problems can handle constraints between heterogeneous tasks and agents [6], the task demands are usually satisfied upon one-step assignment [8] and analysis of dynamically changing demands affected by agent decisions and capabilities is still limited [7], [9]. In particular, a Dec-POMDP formulation has not been formally utilized by a team of heterogeneous agents to provide the comprehensive modeling of the dynamics between agent capabilities, task demands, and perception accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ the stability and adaptive behavior of each agent. Heterogeneity in a team is often considered as the difference in rules of engagement or assignment constraints [6], task suitability [7], or functional heterogeneity [8]. In addition to the heterogeneity in agent task-related capabilities, the difference of agent risk tolerance in decision-making, which has rarely been mentioned in the literature of MATA, also plays a significant role in overall performance especially in human-autonomy teaming under uncertain environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%