2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemostasis by Bipolar Coagulation Versus Suture After Surgical Stripping of Bilateral Ovarian Endometriomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
71
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferrero et al showed through a randomized controlled trial that laparoscopic stripping of ovarian endometriotic cyst significantly decreases ovarian reserve [measured by means of serum anti Mullerian hormon (AMH) and basal FSH levels] independent from the method used to obtain hemostasis on the ovarian tissue (bipolar coagulation or suturing). 21 In our study, the suturing technique was used to control bleeding after cystectomy based on this data but postoperative AFC of operated ovaries was shown to be significantly decreased while the postoperative FSH levels were found to be increased. This findings could not confirm whether the damage of residual ovarian tissue caused by suturing or not.…”
Section: Fshmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Ferrero et al showed through a randomized controlled trial that laparoscopic stripping of ovarian endometriotic cyst significantly decreases ovarian reserve [measured by means of serum anti Mullerian hormon (AMH) and basal FSH levels] independent from the method used to obtain hemostasis on the ovarian tissue (bipolar coagulation or suturing). 21 In our study, the suturing technique was used to control bleeding after cystectomy based on this data but postoperative AFC of operated ovaries was shown to be significantly decreased while the postoperative FSH levels were found to be increased. This findings could not confirm whether the damage of residual ovarian tissue caused by suturing or not.…”
Section: Fshmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A prospective longitudinal study of the short-term measurement of serum AMH levels after ovarian surgery demonstrated that the median AMH level was 2.23 ng/ml (95% CI 1.35-3.41 ng/ml) before surgery but decreased to 0.67 ng/ml (95% CI 1.35-3.41 ng/ml) 1 week post-surgery, and then increased to 1.14 ng/ml (95% CI 0.79-2.36 ng/ml) 1 month post-surgery and 1.50 ng/ml (95% CI 0.58-3.26 ng/ml) at 3 months post-surgery, indicating that ovarian reserve is reduced after ovarian surgery, but restored 3 months post-surgery [25] . Another prospective study regarding long-term measurements of serum AMH levels after ovarian surgery demonstrated that there were no changes in AMH levels at 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery [26] . Therefore, because complete recovery of postoperative ovarian reserve seems to be obtained at 3 months postsurgery, we believe that the timing of AMH measurement at 3 months post-surgery as in this study was appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those haemostatic techniques were also investigated in a randomized controlled trial and no difference was seen between the two haemostatic approaches and pregnancy rate and time to conception [ 31 ]. However, women had a reduced ovarian reserve following ovarian cystectomy irrespective of the method of haemostasis [ 31 ].…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%