2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0266467421000183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Height–diameter allometry in African monodominant forest close to mixed forest

Abstract: African monodominant forests are frequently formed by Gilbertiodendron dewevrei (De Wild.) J. Leonard and commonly found close to mixed forests. However, previous studies have ignored differences between these two forest types in height–diameter allometry, which is extremely important for aboveground biomass (AGB) estimates. This study aims to evaluate the performance of height–diameter models and their effects on height attributes and AGB estimations in African monodominant and mixed forests. Four 1-ha plots … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymptotic models have been demonstrated to better describe height–diameter allometry for aboveground estimation in tropical forests. The Michaelis–Menten model was found to provide a good fit for height–diameter data in central Africa (Fayolle et al, 2016; Loubota Panzou et al, 2021). In each forest site, the Michaelis–Menten model has been used to fit height–diameter allometric relationships for liana‐loaded trees and liana‐free trees using the following equation based on height ( H ) and diameter ( D ) of a tree i belonging to liana factor (liana‐loaded trees and liana‐free trees) l in each forest site: Hilgoodbreak=algoodbreak×Dil/()blgoodbreak+Dil,$$ {H}_{il}={a}_l\times {D}_{il}/\left({b}_l+{D}_{il}\right), $$ where a and b are model parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptotic models have been demonstrated to better describe height–diameter allometry for aboveground estimation in tropical forests. The Michaelis–Menten model was found to provide a good fit for height–diameter data in central Africa (Fayolle et al, 2016; Loubota Panzou et al, 2021). In each forest site, the Michaelis–Menten model has been used to fit height–diameter allometric relationships for liana‐loaded trees and liana‐free trees using the following equation based on height ( H ) and diameter ( D ) of a tree i belonging to liana factor (liana‐loaded trees and liana‐free trees) l in each forest site: Hilgoodbreak=algoodbreak×Dil/()blgoodbreak+Dil,$$ {H}_{il}={a}_l\times {D}_{il}/\left({b}_l+{D}_{il}\right), $$ where a and b are model parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Michaelis-Menten model (M6) was first developed to model enzyme kinetics in chemistry [82]; however, it has been widely employed for modeling height-diameter relationships of various tree species (e.g., [31,[83][84][85]). This model has two biologically meaningful parameters that represent the maximum asymptotic height (β 0 ) a tree can attain, and the steepness (shape) of the curve (β 1 ) that describes the rate of increase in height [84].…”
Section: Base Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found out that plants exhibit a striking similarity in allometry across taxonomic lineages, climate zones, biomes, and disturbance regimes [14]. Until now, few attempts have been made to develop robust height prediction models for Afromontane tree species, while numerous models exist for different tree species in temperate (e.g., [15,[23][24][25][26]) as well as tropical forests [10,[27][28][29][30][31]. In Ethiopia, the existing models are limited in scope and geographic applicability [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, tropical forests contain 40-50% of the carbon stored in terrestrial vegetation (Pan et al 2011;Feldpausch et al 2012), with accurate quantification of these stocks underpinning policies to mitigate CO 2 emissions such as IPCC recommendations and the UN-REDD+ program (Gibbs et al 2007). However, there are still large uncertainties associated with tropical forest carbon stock estimations (Panzou et al 2021). This is partly because the variation in biomass amongst different types of tropical forest is poorly quantified, particularly in Africa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%