2016
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-16-2259-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy snow loads in Finnish forests respond regionally asymmetrically to projected climate change

Abstract: Abstract. This study examined the impacts of projected climate change on heavy snow loads on Finnish forests, where snow-induced forest damage occurs frequently. For snowload calculations, we used daily data from five global climate models under representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, statistically downscaled onto a high-resolution grid using a quantile-mapping method. Our results suggest that projected climate warming results in regionally asymmetric response on heavy snow load… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, forest ecosystem model simulations were conducted for the current climate and changing climate, under two representative concentration pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The representative set of individual GCMs of the CMIP5 database were selected for this study based on their skill at simulating the temperature and precipitation climatology under the current climate (1981-2010) (see, e.g., [15,23,24,44]). We used in this study also the multi-model mean monthly values for temperature and precipitation of 28 GCMs of CMIP5 database under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 forcing scenarios (see, e.g., [21,22]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, forest ecosystem model simulations were conducted for the current climate and changing climate, under two representative concentration pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The representative set of individual GCMs of the CMIP5 database were selected for this study based on their skill at simulating the temperature and precipitation climatology under the current climate (1981-2010) (see, e.g., [15,23,24,44]). We used in this study also the multi-model mean monthly values for temperature and precipitation of 28 GCMs of CMIP5 database under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 forcing scenarios (see, e.g., [21,22]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same correction functions were used to correct both the calibration and scenario periods. The downscaled GCM data have been previously used in Lehtonen et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 selected GCMs, which have a proven ability to relatively accurately simulate the temperature and precipitation of the current climate in northern Europe (Lehtonen et al 2016a(Lehtonen et al , 2016bRuosteenoja et al 2016), provided us with a good representation of the overall variability in the full ensemble of CMIP5 projections for monthly mean temperatures and precipitation for 2010-2099. Too high or low predicted values for daily mean temperatures and precipitation, in relation to the observed data, however, still needed to be bias-corrected, which was done using an empirical bias correction method called quantile mapping (see for more details, Räisänen and Räty 2013;Räty et al 2014).…”
Section: Climate Datamentioning
confidence: 99%