Hypersonic Meteoroid Entry Physics 2019
DOI: 10.1088/2053-2563/aae894ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-particle elementary processes in hypersonic flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem in this case is in the dynamical method adopted, unable to associate tiny variations in the vibrational (classical) state of motion to low quantum probabilities, condition easily met at low total energy. For the details of the QCT issues in this case the reader is referred to [37,42,43], where even a possible solution is suggested, by discriminating weak (purely non-reactive, PNR) and strong (quasi-reactive, QR) interactions in QCT and leaving weak interactions treatment to another simple semiclassical method to be used in conjunction with QCT in an efficient and accurate way (this sort of hybrid semi-QCT could be important even for N + N 2 (v) VT process, because it is very likely that the inelastic process is underestimated by the standard QCT. It is worth noting this is not true for reactive N + N 2 (v) collisions, see [43] for details).…”
Section: Vibrationally Inelastic O + N 2 Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem in this case is in the dynamical method adopted, unable to associate tiny variations in the vibrational (classical) state of motion to low quantum probabilities, condition easily met at low total energy. For the details of the QCT issues in this case the reader is referred to [37,42,43], where even a possible solution is suggested, by discriminating weak (purely non-reactive, PNR) and strong (quasi-reactive, QR) interactions in QCT and leaving weak interactions treatment to another simple semiclassical method to be used in conjunction with QCT in an efficient and accurate way (this sort of hybrid semi-QCT could be important even for N + N 2 (v) VT process, because it is very likely that the inelastic process is underestimated by the standard QCT. It is worth noting this is not true for reactive N + N 2 (v) collisions, see [43] for details).…”
Section: Vibrationally Inelastic O + N 2 Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the details of the QCT issues in this case the reader is referred to [37,42,43], where even a possible solution is suggested, by discriminating weak (purely non-reactive, PNR) and strong (quasi-reactive, QR) interactions in QCT and leaving weak interactions treatment to another simple semiclassical method to be used in conjunction with QCT in an efficient and accurate way (this sort of hybrid semi-QCT could be important even for N + N 2 (v) VT process, because it is very likely that the inelastic process is underestimated by the standard QCT. It is worth noting this is not true for reactive N + N 2 (v) collisions, see [43] for details). It is important to stress here that PNR contribution can be in principle be obtained by forced harmonic oscillator (FHO) method, but this is not the case for QR contribution, which is a reactive dynamics.…”
Section: Vibrationally Inelastic O + N 2 Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%