1984
DOI: 10.1039/c39840001590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heats of adsorption of H2and CO on a Pd/TiO2‘S.M.S.I.’(strong metal–support interaction) catalyst

Abstract: CO and H2 heats of adsorption on Pd/Ti02 are comparable to or higher than those for typical Pd catalysts indicating that suppressed chemisorption capacity in the strong metal-support interaction state is not because of weakened adsorbate-metal bonds.We report here what we believe to be the first measurement of heats of adsorption on a catalyst after it is in the 'S.M.S.I.' state, which is obtained after a high temperature reduction in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…on Pd films: 84 to 147 kJ.mo1-1 for H 2 and 105 to 167 kJ.mol-1 for CO[4]. A support (graphite) different from ours may explain the difference, altl~ough Vannice et al[7] seem to show, also from calorimetric measurements (but rapid and non isothermal, being of the DSC type) that the adsorption enthalpy of CO on Pd is practically the same whatever the support (Sit z, A120 3, TiO2). A support (graphite) different from ours may explain the difference, altl~ough Vannice et al[7] seem to show, also from calorimetric measurements (but rapid and non isothermal, being of the DSC type) that the adsorption enthalpy of CO on Pd is practically the same whatever the support (Sit z, A120 3, TiO2).…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…on Pd films: 84 to 147 kJ.mo1-1 for H 2 and 105 to 167 kJ.mol-1 for CO[4]. A support (graphite) different from ours may explain the difference, altl~ough Vannice et al[7] seem to show, also from calorimetric measurements (but rapid and non isothermal, being of the DSC type) that the adsorption enthalpy of CO on Pd is practically the same whatever the support (Sit z, A120 3, TiO2). A support (graphite) different from ours may explain the difference, altl~ough Vannice et al[7] seem to show, also from calorimetric measurements (but rapid and non isothermal, being of the DSC type) that the adsorption enthalpy of CO on Pd is practically the same whatever the support (Sit z, A120 3, TiO2).…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%