Heat transfer in forced convection of fluid in porous sintered metals

Eroshenko, V. M.; Yaskin, L.A.

doi:10.1007/bf00859466

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The experimental data on interphase heat transfer both in disperse and packed media differ to the largest extent in the region of low Reynolds numbers [1][2][3].One of the reasons for these differences is the fact that in processing the results of the measurements of the heat conductivities of the phases were neglected or incorrectly taken into account.In the present work, the interphase coefficients of heat transfer are determined from the variation of the temperature of the air flow at the exit from the bed of the particles which is the response to the stepped variation of the flow temperature at the entry into the bed. Heat transfer is described by a linear system of equations taking into account the longitudinal heat conductivities of the individual phases…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Experimental examination of heat transfer in disperse media at low Reynolds numbers

Vinokurov¹,

Goncharov²,

Kuznetsov³

et al. 1984

Chem Petrol Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because of the extensive application of plants with a fixed bed of particles in chemical technology and other areas of industry, it is important to know the relationships governing the heat transfer between the particles of the bed and the heat carrier moving through the bed. The experimental data on interphase heat transfer both in disperse and packed media differ to the largest extent in the region of low Reynolds numbers [1][2][3].One of the reasons for these differences is the fact that in processing the results of the measurements of the heat conductivities of the phases were neglected or incorrectly taken into account.In the present work, the interphase coefficients of heat transfer are determined from the variation of the temperature of the air flow at the exit from the bed of the particles which is the response to the stepped variation of the flow temperature at the entry into the bed. Heat transfer is described by a linear system of equations taking into account the longitudinal heat conductivities of the individual phaseswith the initial conditions at @ = 0, t s = tag = tg = O, and the boundary conditions: at entryOl s d~g where y~ = YslXm.= Xg/~ m are the dimensionless effective coefficients of longitudinal heat conductivity ~ respectively the solid phase and the heat carrier; X m is the coefficient of molecular heat conductivity of the heat carrier; ts, tg, tag are the dimensionless mean temperatures of respectively the particles of the solid phase, the heat carrier, and the interface; x = X/d is the dimensionless longitudinal coordinate; Nu v = ~vd2/%m is the Nusselt criterion calculated from the bulk heat-transfer coefficient a v = uSv; a is the surface heat-transfer coefficient; S v is the area of the surface of particles in the unit volume of the charge; 8 = ~T is dimensionless time; ~ = Xm/[(l --S)CsPsd=)]; T is the time; ~ is the porosity; Ca, Ps are respectively specific heat capacity and density of the particles; Pe = RePr = c~p~Ud/v is the Peclet number; Re = pgUd/~ is the Reynolds criterion; Pr = CgV/X m is the Pran~t~ criterion; c~,0g,~ are respectively the specific heat capacity at constant pressure, density, and dynamic viscosity of the heat carrier; U is the rate of filtration calculated from the total cross section of the charge; B = ~Cgp~/ [(l --r is the ratio of the volume heat capacities of the phases; d is the equivalen~ diameter of the particles.In most cases, the family of the equations (i), (2) is solved using the insufficiently justified assumption on the isothermal nature of the solid phase particles, i.e., at t s = tag.In the present work, the ratio of the mean particle temperature t s to the surface temperature particles tag was determined by solving the unidimensiona! heat conductivity equations with respect to particles I a t otp ~. otp

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 98%