1996
DOI: 10.1029/95jc03305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat budgets of the Arctic Mediterranean and sea surface heat flux parameterizations for the Nordic Seas

Abstract: A review is given of volume and heat budgets for the Arctic Ocean and the Nordic Seas based on oceanic transport observations. The present preferred estimates indicate a northward transport of about 300 TW through the Greenland‐Scotland passage of which 50–80 TW continues into the Arctic Ocean. The net budgets for the Nordic Seas are about 220–250 TW. Regional surface heat budgets are computed based on climatological data from the Comprehensive Ocean Atmosphere Data Set and European Centre for Medium Range Wea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
72
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
13
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This especially explains the increased flow in the offshore branch that is more closely related to the gyre circulation than the flow near the West Spitsbergen shelf break and causes an increase in recirculation in central Fram Strait in winter (de Steur et al 2014). Similarly, the airsea heat fluxes over the Nordic Seas are much stronger in winter than in summer (Simonsen and Haugan 1996;Schlichtholz and Houssais 2011), and this is the reason for the hydrographic structure of the Atlantic Water (AW) in the WSC in the different seasons. The weak stratification in winter is a result of the intense winter cooling that the water has been subjected to in the Nordic Seas.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This especially explains the increased flow in the offshore branch that is more closely related to the gyre circulation than the flow near the West Spitsbergen shelf break and causes an increase in recirculation in central Fram Strait in winter (de Steur et al 2014). Similarly, the airsea heat fluxes over the Nordic Seas are much stronger in winter than in summer (Simonsen and Haugan 1996;Schlichtholz and Houssais 2011), and this is the reason for the hydrographic structure of the Atlantic Water (AW) in the WSC in the different seasons. The weak stratification in winter is a result of the intense winter cooling that the water has been subjected to in the Nordic Seas.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the Barents Sea oceanic heat loss to the atmosphere is high and the northeastward flowing water is cooled considerably before it enters the Arctic Ocean (e.g. Simonsen and Haugan, 1996;Schauer et al, 2002). Without water exchange, the total released mass of salt is able to increase the overall salinity on Spitsbergen Bank by up to ∼0.5 and by ∼0.3 on Novaya Zemlya Bank (Fig.…”
Section: Atmospheric Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat transported by the Barents Sea branch of the Norwegian Atlantic Current is effectively lost through intense ocean-atmosphere heat exchange (e.g. Häkkinen and Cavalieri, 1989;Årthun and Schrum, 2010), and according to estimates based on atmospheric observations and oceanic heat budgets about half of the heat loss in the entire Nordic Seas takes place here (Simonsen and Haugan, 1996). It is also one of the largest shallow shelves ad-2 jacent to the Arctic Ocean (1.4×10 6 km 2 ), and the deepest (230 m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It accounts for a substantial part of the dense water that is formed within the Arctic (Martin & Cavalieri 1989) and is therefore important for the renewal of the Intermediate and Deep Water in the Arctic Ocean (Rudels et al 1994;Jones et al 1995;Rudels et al 2000). The continuous advection of warm AW keeps a substantial part of the Barents Sea ice-free year-round (Kvingedal 2005), resulting in a large net heat flux from the ocean to the atmosphere (Simonsen & Haugan 1996;Smedsrud et al 2010). Several processes contribute to the modifications of the BSBW (Pfirman et al 1994;Rudels et al 1994;Ožigin & Ivšin 1999;Rudels et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%