2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health knowledge and non-pharmaceutical interventions during the Covid-19 pandemic in Africa

Abstract: for helpful comments. All errors are our own. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a 2021 study of selected super markets in Mukono and Kampala districts, only 16.6% complied with the COVID-19 guidelines [ 11 ], while in a countrywide survey conducted during the first outbreak phase in Uganda in 2020, a 29.0% level of compliance to SOPs was reported [ 9 ]. This study provided evidence of a significant improvement in the implementation of NPIs against COVID-19 which could probably be attributed to increased awareness of the public health implications of the outbreak that induced high vigilance among people with time [ 21 , 26 , 27 ]. The considerably high adherence to the SOPs could have resulted from active enforcement by company owners to avoid their operations being blocked by the government due to breach of Ministry of Health set guidelines for control of COVID-19 in factories [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a 2021 study of selected super markets in Mukono and Kampala districts, only 16.6% complied with the COVID-19 guidelines [ 11 ], while in a countrywide survey conducted during the first outbreak phase in Uganda in 2020, a 29.0% level of compliance to SOPs was reported [ 9 ]. This study provided evidence of a significant improvement in the implementation of NPIs against COVID-19 which could probably be attributed to increased awareness of the public health implications of the outbreak that induced high vigilance among people with time [ 21 , 26 , 27 ]. The considerably high adherence to the SOPs could have resulted from active enforcement by company owners to avoid their operations being blocked by the government due to breach of Ministry of Health set guidelines for control of COVID-19 in factories [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…No pharmaceutical interventions including personnel and public protective practices have been reported to play a signifcant role of preventing occurrence and spread of public health challenges, thereby promoting good livelihoods and minimizing the burden on the already strained healthcare systems [8,[19][20][21]. Tis study assessed the level of adherence to a number of NPIs set by the government of Uganda as SOPs to be implemented by factories as a prerogative for their opening and continued operation during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing health information can improve individual health outcomes [45]. In the fight against COVID-19, government actions to deliver messages have been associated with meaningful behavioral changes, such as wearing masks and washing hands [46]. Limited or missing environmental quality information has a particular impact on households' housing choices, thereby affecting their exposure to biological pollution and household welfare.…”
Section: Eid and Pebmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our main analysis relies on in-person voucher redemption to link individual HIV test seekers to study identifiers, we are limited in our ability to measure HIV testing behavior after the study ends. We conducted a follow-up survey in 2020, to study longer-run treatment effects and analyze beliefs and behaviors related to COVID-19 (Fitzpatrick et al 2021). We did attempt to contact all 1,232 men from our original sample to conduct a phone survey.…”
Section: Appendix A2 Appointments For Other Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%