2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Header design tradeoffs in microchannel evaporators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the thermal performance is significantly deteriorated. According to Kulkarni et al [1], the performance reduction by flow mal-distribution could be as large as 20%. The most of the studies on two-phase distribution in a header-branch configuration have been conducted on a single pass configuration [ Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the thermal performance is significantly deteriorated. According to Kulkarni et al [1], the performance reduction by flow mal-distribution could be as large as 20%. The most of the studies on two-phase distribution in a header-branch configuration have been conducted on a single pass configuration [ Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the refrigerant distribution is much more penalizing for these exchangers than for round tube heat exchangers. Indeed, according to Kulkarni et al [2], an uneven distribution may result in a performance reduction up to 20 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The none-uniform distribution of two phase refrigerant in evaporator can significantly deteriorate the heat exchanger performance as well as system efficiency. Many simulation results shows that the capacity degradation due to refrigerant maldistribution ranges from 5% to 23% (Kulkarni et al, 2004;Brix et al 2009Brix et al , 2010Zou et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%