2012
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2012.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head-to-head comparison of single-breath and tidal-breath exhaled nitric oxide measurements

Abstract: Background: exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is an endogenous gas involved in airway pathophysiology and is determined in orally exhaled air by various techniques. however, traditional single-breath technique (eNO sB ) requires active cooperation and is not always easily practicable (especially in young children); simpler techniques including tidal breathing measurements (eNO TB ) are not standardized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible correlation and correspondence between eNO sB and eNO TB and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ATS guidelines attempted to create a uniform method for measuring and reporting exhaled NO, however, investigators remain reluctant about the procedure, and have looked for other ways to measure exhaled NO [28][29][30]. Some studies compared the single breath measurement with measurement from mixed expired air during tidal breathing [15,29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ATS guidelines attempted to create a uniform method for measuring and reporting exhaled NO, however, investigators remain reluctant about the procedure, and have looked for other ways to measure exhaled NO [28][29][30]. Some studies compared the single breath measurement with measurement from mixed expired air during tidal breathing [15,29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies compared the single breath measurement with measurement from mixed expired air during tidal breathing [15,29,31]. Mixed expired samples may be highly affected by NO in dead space (physiological and anatomical) or contamination by NO derived from ambient or nasal NO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%