2004
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.75.1.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HEAD 1.0: A Unified HEllenic Accelerogram Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since GMPEs are mainly used for the prediction of seismic damage scenarios, the calibration and validation of the models within the present study were performed using only data relative to events of moment magnitude not less than 4.0. The dataset incorporates the HEAD v1.0 strong‐motion database for the period 1973 to 1999, where however we have excluded all poor‐quality data with low signal‐to‐noise ratio. After 2000, we have used selective data from the permanent network of NOA along with data from the EUROSEISTEST database .…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since GMPEs are mainly used for the prediction of seismic damage scenarios, the calibration and validation of the models within the present study were performed using only data relative to events of moment magnitude not less than 4.0. The dataset incorporates the HEAD v1.0 strong‐motion database for the period 1973 to 1999, where however we have excluded all poor‐quality data with low signal‐to‐noise ratio. After 2000, we have used selective data from the permanent network of NOA along with data from the EUROSEISTEST database .…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissemination of ISESD and ESMD strong-motion databases was followed by important national and international strong-motion and seismic hazard projects in Europe and surrounding regions. Among these projects, the ITalian Theodulidis et al 2004) are national efforts to compile, process and archive local (national) accelerometric data using state-of-the-art techniques. Figures 12.4a,b show the magnitude vs. distance scatters of ITACA 5 and T-NSMP databases as of the day they are released.…”
Section: Evolution Of Major Strong-motion Databases In the Broader Eumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each used accelerogram is compatible (for equivalent viscous ratio damping 0.05) with the respective design elastic response spectrum that is proposed by Eurocode EN 1998-1 for soil category D. The two accelerograms of each pair are practically uncorrelated between them and act simultaneously. Moreover, each accelerogram has many of the characteristic properties of the Hellenic earthquakes, according to the database of the Hellenic earthquake records [28].…”
Section: Modelling Of the Seismic Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) is richer than the frequency content of the natural elastic response spectra. Moreover, these artificial accelerograms possess adequate strong motion duration, adequate number of significant dynamic loading cycles, as well as adequate Arias Intensity according to Hellenic strong earthquakes [28].…”
Section: Modelling Of the Seismic Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%