2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2009.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvesting community annotations on 3D models of museum artefacts to enhance knowledge, discovery and re-use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus is now to evolve from the first steps of observation (creating digital representations of the artworks under study) to the design and use of tools to support the investigation of scholars working over digital representations [SCC*11]. Therefore, annotation remains a common feature of many CH tools or systems [SSRS12, HG10, AAB*14]. Semi‐automatic methods have been proposed to annotate collections of artworks, adding semantic metadata by means of an automatic, suggestion‐driven process [FKW17] or by adopting harvesting methods able to collect and integrate community annotations [HG10].In the domain of artwork restoration, the analysis of the conservation status, the planning of the restoration action or its post‐execution documentation are usually implemented by the production of complex maps, where the surface of the artwork is characterized and described in detail [ABC*18], leading to very complex annotation patterns (see Figure bottom). Archives of 3D models : With the advent of easy‐to‐use 3D digitization and digital fabrication technologies, a number of web‐based archives for 3D models appeared.…”
Section: Applications Requiring Annotation Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus is now to evolve from the first steps of observation (creating digital representations of the artworks under study) to the design and use of tools to support the investigation of scholars working over digital representations [SCC*11]. Therefore, annotation remains a common feature of many CH tools or systems [SSRS12, HG10, AAB*14]. Semi‐automatic methods have been proposed to annotate collections of artworks, adding semantic metadata by means of an automatic, suggestion‐driven process [FKW17] or by adopting harvesting methods able to collect and integrate community annotations [HG10].In the domain of artwork restoration, the analysis of the conservation status, the planning of the restoration action or its post‐execution documentation are usually implemented by the production of complex maps, where the surface of the artwork is characterized and described in detail [ABC*18], leading to very complex annotation patterns (see Figure bottom). Archives of 3D models : With the advent of easy‐to‐use 3D digitization and digital fabrication technologies, a number of web‐based archives for 3D models appeared.…”
Section: Applications Requiring Annotation Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus is now to evolve from the first steps of observation (creating digital representations of the artworks under study) to the design and use of tools to support the investigation of scholars working over digital representations [SCC*11]. Therefore, annotation remains a common feature of many CH tools or systems [SSRS12, HG10, AAB*14]. Semi‐automatic methods have been proposed to annotate collections of artworks, adding semantic metadata by means of an automatic, suggestion‐driven process [FKW17] or by adopting harvesting methods able to collect and integrate community annotations [HG10].…”
Section: Applications Requiring Annotation Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic Annotation Services Project includes exploring new tools to support the annotation of 3D digital representations of cultural heritage artefacts, using the recently developed Open Annotation (OA) data model [20].…”
Section: E-researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the museums context, another system assisted by ontologies that aims the collaborative annotations of 3D museum artifacts through web-based services, was proposed (Hunter and Gerber, 2010). This system -entitled Harvesting and Aggregating Networked Annotations (HarvANA) -promotes the participation of communities in the cultural enrichment and improves museum objects indexation.…”
Section: Virtual Representations Based On Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been successfully applied in different solutions that require the use of virtual models/environments (Lee et al, 2008a;Attene et al, 2009;Hunter and Gerber, 2010) to achieve a wide variety of purposes that range from the planning of neurosurgery operation to the cataloguing of museum artefacts. A few procedural modelling solutions also used them to guide the process of generating virtual models (Liu et al, 2008;Trescak et al, 2010;Tutenel et al, 2011).…”
Section: Regulation Through Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%