2011
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling time and the evolution of caching behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). More detailed research is additionally required on the energetic trade‐offs associated with food caching (Jorge, Brown & van der Merwe ). We were able to demonstrate some of the benefits that leopards obtained from caching, but we could not measure the costs of hoisting kills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). More detailed research is additionally required on the energetic trade‐offs associated with food caching (Jorge, Brown & van der Merwe ). We were able to demonstrate some of the benefits that leopards obtained from caching, but we could not measure the costs of hoisting kills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handling time costs of seeds (e.g. energy expenditure and/or predation risk) increase with seed coat hardness and, therefore, these seeds tend to be hoarded for future use rather than eaten immediately by animals, especially when foraging time is constrained and seed resources are limited or ephemeral (Jacob 1992; Jorge et al 2012). Spending more time on eating hard and large seeds may not only increase the possibility of predation risk, but also reduce food occupancy when food resources are ephemeral in the field (Lima & Dill 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the high nutrition hypothesis predicts that highly nutritious seeds are more likely to be hoarded by animals due to their higher energy rewards (Gerber et al 2004), suggesting that highly nutritious seeds have higher dispersal fitness than less nutritional seeds. The handling time hypothesis predicts that large and/or hard seeds are more likely to be hoarded by animals because of the high handling costs associated with eating these seeds (Jacobs 1992;Jorge et al 2012), suggesting that high handling cost seeds have higher dispersal fitness than low handling cost seeds. The seed odor hypothesis states that seeds that emit strong odor are less likely to be scatter-hoarded (Yi et al 2016), but are more likely to be pilfered by rodents Hollander et al 2012), suggesting that seed dispersal fitness varies at different stages of dispersal under animal mediation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodents' decisions are usually framed within optimal foraging models where decisions should maximize food intake and reduce foraging costs (Lima & Dill 1990;Brown & Kotler 2004;Jorge, Brown & van der Merwe 2012). In this scenario, it is well documented that predation risk is a key foraging cost for small rodents (Sih 1980;Lima & Dill 1990;Brown, Laundr e & Gurung 1999) given that they are at the base of many trophic webs and so are a common prey of a wide array of terrestrial and aerial predators (Jedrzejewski, Rychlik & Jedrzejewska 1993;Taraborelli et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%