2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hamstring Autograft Size Can Be Predicted and Is a Potential Risk Factor for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
304
11
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
304
11
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Causes of graft failure are multifactorial with the most important being trauma, technical error and failure of graft incorporation (12). It has not yet been determined which fixation method and what position of the drilling tunnels offers a lower rate of graft failure (12,13). Graft failure rate in our study was 12% and the result is comparable with previous papers, which reported graft failure of quadruple stranded STGR in 4% -15.3% (13,14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Causes of graft failure are multifactorial with the most important being trauma, technical error and failure of graft incorporation (12). It has not yet been determined which fixation method and what position of the drilling tunnels offers a lower rate of graft failure (12,13). Graft failure rate in our study was 12% and the result is comparable with previous papers, which reported graft failure of quadruple stranded STGR in 4% -15.3% (13,14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It has not yet been determined which fixation method and what position of the drilling tunnels offers a lower rate of graft failure (12,13). Graft failure rate in our study was 12% and the result is comparable with previous papers, which reported graft failure of quadruple stranded STGR in 4% -15.3% (13,14). Although short of statistical significance, group 2 tended to have higher rate of graft failure than group 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…One systematic review cited a 6.8 times greater relative risk of failure at or below 8 mm in width and noted that in the patients younger than 20 years of age grafts larger than 8 mm decreased failure rates [7]. One retrospective study showed revision was non-existent in patients of all ages with graft size >8 mm and that 18.3% of patients less than 18 years old and with a graft width of less than 8 mm underwent revision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] In recent studies, the authors have indicated that the diameter of tendon equal to or more than 8 mm decreases the risk of graft failure. [2,4] However, the diameter of the hamstring graft can only be determined after folding the harvested autograft into 4-stranded. [5] This situation leads to interest in finding ways to predict graft diameter preoperatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%