2013
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halo-independent methods for inelastic dark matter scattering

Abstract: We present halo-independent methods to analyze the results of dark matter direct detection experiments assuming inelastic scattering. We focus on the annual modulation signal reported by DAMA/LIBRA and present three different halo-independent tests. First, we compare it to the upper limit on the unmodulated rate from XENON100 using (a) the trivial requirement that the amplitude of the annual modulation has to be smaller than the bound on the unmodulated rate, and (b) a bound on the annual modulation amplitude … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the assumption that there is no dark form factor, the event distributions (once we have compensated for the different target nuclei) with respect to v min should be the same for each of the experiments [26][27][28][29][30][31] -any disagreement indicates the presence of some extra effect. For a dark form factor, since q(v min ) = 2µ XN v min , changing µ XN by changing m N will change the range of F X (q) that we sample (significantly so if the DM mass is larger than those of the SM target nuclei).…”
Section: Jhep07(2015)133mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the assumption that there is no dark form factor, the event distributions (once we have compensated for the different target nuclei) with respect to v min should be the same for each of the experiments [26][27][28][29][30][31] -any disagreement indicates the presence of some extra effect. For a dark form factor, since q(v min ) = 2µ XN v min , changing µ XN by changing m N will change the range of F X (q) that we sample (significantly so if the DM mass is larger than those of the SM target nuclei).…”
Section: Jhep07(2015)133mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of unknown form factors, all experimental data can be mapped into v minspace at each DM mass and compared without specifying the nature of the astrophysical distribution or density of DM [39,40]. These "halo-independent" methods have received significant attention [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. We generalize these methods to cover relativistic scattering as well, where the "halo-independence" here comes from the absence of specific assumptions regarding the local DM density, density profile, velocity distribution, and annihilation source.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the basis of the HI framework developed to compare among DD signals and limits, extended also to annual modulation signals [8,9] in refs. [10,11], and to inelastic scattering [12]. Recently in refs.…”
Section: Motivation: a New Halo-independent Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By extracting the halo integral η(E R ), one can check if it is compatible with the signal being due to DM, as different energy branches contribute to the same velocity range and therefore should give the same rate, see ref. [12] for this shape test. From this observed η(E R ) spectrum we can derive the minimum energy E obs min whereη(E R ) is maximal (lowest v m (E R )), and exothermic (dashed) interactions with δ = 50 (−50) keV, respectively.…”
Section: Inelastic Scattering (Exothermic and Endothermic) In Dd And mentioning
confidence: 99%