1960
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1960.00950020411003
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Hallermann-Streiff Syndrome

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
77
2
0
0

Citation Types

0
5
1
0

Year Published

Range
1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
67
12

Relationship

0
79

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 79 publications

(6 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

0
5
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The present case shows a complete absence of the lens in both eyes. Falls and Schull (1960) have reported the spontaneous rupture and absorption of the cataractous lens in two of their cases, but in the present case there was no evidence of any capsular remnants or shreds on slit-lamp examination and the pupillary area was perfectly clear. There was no history of any eye operation, the patient's vision being the same from the very beginning.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In one case only (Falls and Schull, 1960) was there a clear history of exposure to measles in the first trimester, but the mother did not suffer from any disease during pregnancy and she had had rubella previously. Therefore in this case, too, there is no conclusive evidence to show that any exogenous aetiological agent is in any way related to this syndrome.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that most of these patients remained unmarried because of their unattractive physical appearance and that none of them had any offspring does not totally exclude this factor. Frangois (1958) and Ullrich and Fremerey-Dohna (1953) have suggested that it may be either a recessive affection or a mutation. Falls and Schull (1960) consider recessive affection as unlikely in view of the sporadic occurrence and the total absence of consanguineous marriages amongst the patients reported.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations