1957
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1957.01550170046008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hair-Follicle Nevus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meischer first described this entity in 1944 and named it trichofolliculoma [4]. In 1957, Hyman and Clayman [5] reported a similar case and named it "hair follicle nevus." Kligman and Pinkus [3], on the other hand, stated that the definition of nevus would not be an appropriate definition since this tumor shows different stages of hair follicle differentiation histopathologically, and the name "tricofolliculoma," previously made by Meischer, was accepted for this tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meischer first described this entity in 1944 and named it trichofolliculoma [4]. In 1957, Hyman and Clayman [5] reported a similar case and named it "hair follicle nevus." Kligman and Pinkus [3], on the other hand, stated that the definition of nevus would not be an appropriate definition since this tumor shows different stages of hair follicle differentiation histopathologically, and the name "tricofolliculoma," previously made by Meischer, was accepted for this tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other cases were pubUshed under the designation of hair foUicle naevus by Prinz (1951) and by Hyman and dayman (1957). Miescher (1944) was responsible for the designation trichofoUiculoma and Woringer (1961) published a clear clinical and histological review of a case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%