1957
Hair-Follicle Nevus
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
26
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
2
0
0
Year Published
1958
2026
Publication Types
Select...
18
5
4
Relationship
0
27
Authors
Journals
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
References 5 publications
0
2
0
0
“…Meischer first described this entity in 1944 and named it trichofolliculoma [4]. In 1957, Hyman and Clayman [5] reported a similar case and named it "hair follicle nevus." Kligman and Pinkus [3], on the other hand, stated that the definition of nevus would not be an appropriate definition since this tumor shows different stages of hair follicle differentiation histopathologically, and the name "tricofolliculoma," previously made by Meischer, was accepted for this tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meischer first described this entity in 1944 and named it trichofolliculoma [4]. In 1957, Hyman and Clayman [5] reported a similar case and named it "hair follicle nevus." Kligman and Pinkus [3], on the other hand, stated that the definition of nevus would not be an appropriate definition since this tumor shows different stages of hair follicle differentiation histopathologically, and the name "tricofolliculoma," previously made by Meischer, was accepted for this tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other cases were pubUshed under the designation of hair foUicle naevus by Prinz (1951) and by Hyman and dayman (1957). Miescher (1944) was responsible for the designation trichofoUiculoma and Woringer (1961) published a clear clinical and histological review of a case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
