21Plant reproductive tissues (PRTs) can decrease (via reduced consumption) or increase (via 22 numerical response) an omnivores consumption of animal prey. Although PRTs can increase 23 predation pressure through numerical responses of omnivores, PRTs may also suppress predation 24 by increasing omnivore interactions with conspecifics. Despite this potential, studies of the 25 impacts of PRTs on predation by omnivores often overlook the effect of these tissues on 26 intraspecific interactions between omnivores. We designed three studies to examine how PRTs 27 and conspecific density impact prey consumption by ladybeetle omnivores. First, we assessed 28 how PRTs impact scale insect consumption by isolated ladybeetles. Second, we measured how 29 PRTs influence ladybeetle prey suppression when numerical responses were possible. Third, 30 because initial experiments suggested the consumption rates of individual ladybeetles depended 31 upon conspecific density, we compared per capita consumption rates of ladybeetles across 32 ladybeetle density. PRTs did not influence prey consumption by isolated ladybeetles. When 33 numerical responses were possible, PRTs did not influence total predation on prey despite 34 increasing ladybeetle density, suggesting that PRTs decreased per capita prey consumption by 35 ladybeetles. The discrepancy between our lab and field studies is likely a consequence of 36 differences in ladybeetle density -the presence of only two other conspecifics decreased per 37 capita prey consumption by 76%. Our findings suggest that PRTs may not alter the population 38 level effects of omnivores on prey when omnivore numerical responses are offset by reductions 39 in per capita predation rate.40 Keywords: alternative resources, consumptive effects, indirect effects, intraspecific interactions, 41 non-prey foods, omnivory, pollen, apparent competition 3 42 Introduction 43 Omnivory (i.e. consuming resources from multiple trophic levels) [1] is ubiquitous within 44 several taxa (e.g. birds, mammals, reptiles, insects, and fishes) and influences the structure and 45 function of communities [2-3]. Interactions between omnivores and their plant and animal prey 46 can account for up to 78% of species' links in food webs [4]. Despite their prevalence, we lack a 47 basic understanding about how plant reproductive tissues (hereafter, PRTs) affect interactions 48 between omnivores and their prey in natural systems. Some studies suggest that PRTs decrease 49 prey consumption by omnivores [5-6], whereas others suggest the opposite [7]. This discrepancy 50 may be exacerbated by methodological approaches and the spatial scale of the study [8-9]. For 51 instance, many omnivory studies focus on isolated omnivores feeding on a sub-set of possible 52 resources, which only allows omnivore consumption to depend on resource density and the 53 availability of PRTs [8,10]. Such approaches fail to allow important intraspecific interactions 54 (e.g., mating, cannibalism, and competition) and interspecific interactions (e.g., pre...