2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2020.0393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H∞ leader‐based consensus of non‐linear multi‐agents over switching graphs and disturbances using multiple Lyapunov functions

Abstract: This study deals with the multiple Lyapunov functions approach for the robust leader‐following consensus of one‐sided Lipschitz (OSL) multiagents, connected via switching topologies under external disturbances. Disturbances have been accounted for followers, connected via a directed graph with a spanning tree from the leader root. The authors stipulate two consensus protocols, based on the absence or existence of norm‐bounded reference input to the leader, and provide matrix inequalities for designing the para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consensus problem for Lipschitz nonlinear MASs was addressed in [4,[14][15][16][17][18]. Recently, the consensus of systems having a more generalized form than the Lipschitz one, called the one-sided Lipschitz (OSL) dynamics, has been studied in [19][20][21]. OSL systems are less conservative than the conventional Lipschitz systems because the former form has a smaller magnitude of the nonlinearity parameter, and the relevant nonlinearity constant can have either a positive or a negative sign [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus problem for Lipschitz nonlinear MASs was addressed in [4,[14][15][16][17][18]. Recently, the consensus of systems having a more generalized form than the Lipschitz one, called the one-sided Lipschitz (OSL) dynamics, has been studied in [19][20][21]. OSL systems are less conservative than the conventional Lipschitz systems because the former form has a smaller magnitude of the nonlinearity parameter, and the relevant nonlinearity constant can have either a positive or a negative sign [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, this approach appends an undesirable time lag into the system. A robust H controller [14] based guidance strategy is discussed in [15], where the difficulty faced during solving the resulting Hamilton‐Jacobi (HJ) partial differential inequality raises doubts on its online applicability. Gain scheduling strategies [16, 17] have also been applied for designing robust guidance strategies, but this approach suffers from instability issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%