2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2019)136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H + 1 jet production revisited

Abstract: We revisit the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) calculation of the Higgs boson+1 jet production process, calculated in the m t → ∞ effective field theory. We perform a detailed comparison of the result calculated using the jettiness slicing method, with published results obtained using subtraction methods. The results of the jettiness calculation agree with the two previous subtraction calculations at benchmark points. The performance of the jettiness slicing approach is greatly improved by adopting a defi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perturbative corrections to Higgs+jet production have been computed in an EFT with an integrated-out top-quark up to NNLO [84][85][86][87][88][89][90], and also in the full theory with a finite top-quark mass up to NLO [91]. Scale uncertainties at NNLO are about 10% inclusively and differentially.…”
Section: Jhep12(2019)034mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perturbative corrections to Higgs+jet production have been computed in an EFT with an integrated-out top-quark up to NNLO [84][85][86][87][88][89][90], and also in the full theory with a finite top-quark mass up to NLO [91]. Scale uncertainties at NNLO are about 10% inclusively and differentially.…”
Section: Jhep12(2019)034mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed-order perturbative predictions of the p H t spectrum in gluon fusion are currently available at next-to-next-toleading order (NNLO) in the strong coupling α s [15][16][17][18][19] in the infinite top-mass limit, and heavy-quark mass effects are known up to next-to-leading order (NLO) [20][21][22][23][24]. Fixed-order perturbation theory is, however, insufficient to accurately describe the observable considered here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power corrections at NLO have been extensively studied in Refs. [164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173] both for N -jettiness and transverse momentum distributions, in the context of the N -jettiness subtraction method, and in Refs. [174][175][176][177][178][179] within SCETbased subtraction methods.…”
Section: Higher-order Power Corrections At Nlomentioning
confidence: 99%