Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2006
DOI: 10.2523/103156-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for Shale Inhibition During Openhole Gravel Packing With Water-Based Fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unstable shale in openhole sections may cause premature screenouts, reduction of the permeability of gravel packs, and inability to run completion tools and assemblies (Shenoy 2008).…”
Section: Case 3 Reactive Silt Shale Formation With Sandstone Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unstable shale in openhole sections may cause premature screenouts, reduction of the permeability of gravel packs, and inability to run completion tools and assemblies (Shenoy 2008).…”
Section: Case 3 Reactive Silt Shale Formation With Sandstone Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to formulate an invert water-pack system provides advantages over traditional aqueous or water-based systems by reducing risks associated with: brine-sensitive shale rock, brine-sensitive sands, excessive ECD, and even the potential to reduce hydraulics without the addition of a friction reducer (Shenoy et al 2006). Kelkar et al (2001) warned that "high internal phase fractions would yield high densities at the expense of very high viscosity and low internal phase fractions would yield acceptable viscosity at the expense of reduced fluid densities."…”
Section: Water-packing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useful work has been done on assessing clay behaviour where candidate well fluids are circulated at high rates through a shale core (Shenoy et al, 2006). Dynamic flow through tests (DFTT).…”
Section: Rock Mineralogymentioning
confidence: 99%