Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography

Abstract

Use of high-resolution micro-computed tomography (mCT) imaging to assess trabecular and cortical bone morphology has grown immensely. There are several commercially available mCT systems, each with different approaches to image acquisition, evaluation, and reporting of outcomes. This lack of consistency makes it difficult to interpret reported results and to compare findings across different studies. This article addresses this critical need for standardized terminology and consistent reporting of parameters related to image acquisition and analysis, and key outcome assessments, particularly with respect to ex vivo analysis of rodent specimens. Thus the guidelines herein provide recommendations regarding (1) standardized terminology and units, (2) information to be included in describing the methods for a given experiment, and (3) a minimal set of outcome variables that should be reported. Whereas the specific research objective will determine the experimental design, these guidelines are intended to ensure accurate and consistent reporting of mCT-derived bone morphometry and density measurements. In particular, the methods section for papers that present mCT-based outcomes must include details of the following scan aspects: (1) image acquisition, including the scanning medium, X-ray tube potential, and voxel size, as well as clear descriptions of the size and location of the volume of interest and the method used to delineate trabecular and cortical bone regions, and (2) image processing, including the algorithms used for image filtration and the approach used for image segmentation. Morphometric analyses should be based on 3D algorithms that do not rely on assumptions about the underlying structure whenever possible. When reporting mCT results, the minimal set of variables that should be used to describe trabecular bone morphometry includes bone volume fraction and trabecular number, thickness, and separation. The minimal set of variables that should be used to describe cortical bone morphometry includes total cross-sectional area, cortical bone area, cortical bone area fraction, and cortical thickness. Other variables also may be appropriate depending on the research question and technical quality of the scan. Standard nomenclature, outlined in this article, should be followed for reporting of results. ß

Adult Stem Cell Mobilization Enhances Intramembranous Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Study

“…The output variables included cortical bone area, total cross-sectional area, medullary space area, cortical thickness, and cortical area fraction. All variables use recently established nomenclature [6]. For Experiment 1, we did not statistically analyze the CFU data since they were generated after pooling PB within each group, meaning only one sample was available per group.…”

Pharmacological inhibition of PPARγ increases osteoblastogenesis and bone mass in male C57BL/6 mice

“…Nomenclature and abbreviations of 3D-mCT parameters follow the recommendations of the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research. (14) Histological and histomorphometrical analysis of bone…”

Relationship between microstructure and degree of mineralization in subchondral bone of osteoarthritis: A synchrotron radiation µCT study

“…(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) ConnD is a parameter of trabecular connectivity, where a higher value means greater connectivity. SMI is an index evaluating whether trabecular bone is rod-like or plate-like; a small value means a more plate-like structure.…”