2016
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth rate inhibition metrics correct for confounders in measuring sensitivity to cancer drugs

Abstract: Drug sensitivity and resistance are conventionally quantified by IC50 or Emax values, but these metrics are highly sensitive to the number of divisions taking place over the course of a response assay. The dependency of IC50 and Emax on division rate creates artefactual correlations between genotype and drug sensitivity while obscuring valuable biological insights and interfering with biomarker discovery. We derive alternative drug response metrics that are insensitive to division number. These are based on es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
802
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(813 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
802
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible explanations include unfavorable pharmacokinetics (Undevia et al, 2005), the difficulty of scoring synergy in pre-clinical data (Hafner et al, 2016), and the sensitivity of synergy to genetic variation. Drug interactions are also known to vary with dose and our analysis is relevant only to clinical dosing, which frequently differs from pre-clinical dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations include unfavorable pharmacokinetics (Undevia et al, 2005), the difficulty of scoring synergy in pre-clinical data (Hafner et al, 2016), and the sensitivity of synergy to genetic variation. Drug interactions are also known to vary with dose and our analysis is relevant only to clinical dosing, which frequently differs from pre-clinical dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolic activity for treated samples was normalized to the untreated control. Additionally, growth rate inhibition (GR), as described in Hafner et al [57], was measured in hydrogels at concentrations of 0, 25, 100, 250, and 500 ”M TMZ after 7 days of culture. Relative cell count was assessed after 48 hours after treatment with the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability assay (Promega, Madison, WI) using a protocol derived from Lin et al [58].…”
Section: Analysis Of Gbm Response To Temozolomide (Tmz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hafner et al [57], and the GR50 was calculated using the Online GR Calculator peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Analysis Of Gbm Response To Temozolomide (Tmz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug response was expressed as IC 50 and GR 50 values. 3 Drug response metrics were associated with genomic alterations in the cell lines. These were retrieved from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer database and filtered for relevance in primary patient tumours.…”
Section: Cell Line Panel Profiling Of All Clinically Approved Kinasementioning
confidence: 99%