2018
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth patterns and overbite depth indicators of long and short faces in Korean adolescents: Revisited through mixed‐effects analysis

Abstract: Structured Abstract Objective The purpose was to evaluate skeletal factors related to the growth of subjects with skeletal open and deep bites based on lateral cephalographs from 9 years of pure longitudinal data using mixed effect analysis. Setting and Sample Population Fifty‐one children with extreme lower anterior facial height to total anterior facial height (LAFH/TAFH) ratio values at the age of 14 were assigned to either skeletal open bite or skeletal deep bite groups from a total of 223 subjects. Materi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in both posterior and anterior facial heights among facial types, manifest in part by coordinated maxillomandibular orientation, are supported by previous work. 17 , 22 Our results contrast with Nanda 2 and others 4 , 41 , 43 who have argued that these morphologic differences are associated primarily with differential growth in the vertical anterior dimensions of the face with little difference in posterior facial height among classifications.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Differences in both posterior and anterior facial heights among facial types, manifest in part by coordinated maxillomandibular orientation, are supported by previous work. 17 , 22 Our results contrast with Nanda 2 and others 4 , 41 , 43 who have argued that these morphologic differences are associated primarily with differential growth in the vertical anterior dimensions of the face with little difference in posterior facial height among classifications.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…6 This analysis indicates that some differences in average morphology among the 3 facial types are established by 6 years of age, as previously noted. 6,19 Nevertheless, here we show that each type follows a unique average growth trajectory until adulthood, indicating different adolescent growth patterns, 2,4,17,41 with hypodivergent and normodivergent growth patterns more similar to each other than either is to the hyperdivergent growth pattern (Fig 2). These findings suggest the need for a nuanced interpretation of growth when attempting to estimate future face shape that accounts not only for early established differences in morphology but also the distinct growth trajectories among facial types that will further contribute to differences in face shape at later ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11,12 The ODI and APDI cephalometric variables have assisted orthodontists in proper diagnosis and treatment planning; however, mean ODI and APDI values have been assessed only in whites 7,8 and Asians. 13,14 To date, there are no published data regarding the mean ODI and APDI values in African Americans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%