1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.56.2376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of Fractally Rough Colloids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For CNT, Bauhofer and Kovacs 1 have related experimental t values for threedimensional percolating systems between 1.3 and 4, which would be consistent with the MCFFS value t = 2.21 ± 0.15. Other studies have also shown that the percolation threshold is dependent of conductive fillers morphology (size, shape and the aspect ratio) [24][25][26][27] . The distribution of scattered points is not a real situation of electrically conductive composites; however, this method of particles distribution has been widely adopted for comparison with known percolation threshold values [28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Verification Of Simulator For Scattered Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CNT, Bauhofer and Kovacs 1 have related experimental t values for threedimensional percolating systems between 1.3 and 4, which would be consistent with the MCFFS value t = 2.21 ± 0.15. Other studies have also shown that the percolation threshold is dependent of conductive fillers morphology (size, shape and the aspect ratio) [24][25][26][27] . The distribution of scattered points is not a real situation of electrically conductive composites; however, this method of particles distribution has been widely adopted for comparison with known percolation threshold values [28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Verification Of Simulator For Scattered Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the NMR technique has been applied to the determination of fractal dimensions of synthetic silicas (Devreux et al 1990), it is not apparent that it should be applicable to natural materials like clays for the following reason. Silica aggregation is usually a fractal process (Schaefer and Martin 1984;Keefer and Schaefer 1986;Schaefer 1989;Bottero et al 1990). Thus, in a synthetic siliceous material it is possible to end up with a fractal distribution of paramagnetic impurities that can be related to D m. However, in clay minerals the distribution of paramagnetic impurities, for example Fe, on exchange sites and/or substituted in the crystal lattice is a function of the clay's crystallography.…”
Section: ~%~ M~~176mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass fractal scaling can be associated with the packing efficiency of an aggregate, which in turn depends on the type of aggregation, e.g., diffusion or reaction limited mechanism. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] On the other hand, surface fractal scaling only relates to the perimeter of a particle or aggregate of particles and correlates with its specific surface area. [1][2][3][4][5] The core idea behind mass fractals stems from our need to statistically describe aggregation processes involving primary particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractal nature of colloids can be experimentally quantified using scattering techniques, and based on a combination of theoretical and experimental evidence [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] two distinct scaling laws have been used to describe experimental observations: mass fractals and surface fractals. Mass fractal scaling can be associated with the packing efficiency of an aggregate, which in turn depends on the type of aggregation, e.g., diffusion or reaction limited mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%