2009
DOI: 10.1080/13632460902859151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Based on Data from the Himalayan and Zagros Regions

Abstract: This study derives ground-motion prediction equations for the horizontal elastic response spectral acceleration for 5% damping for application to the Indian Himalayas. The present equations include a consideration of site category (rock/soil) and style-of-faulting (strike-slip/reverse). Due to a lack of near-field data from India additional strong-motion data have been included from the Zagros region of Iran, which has comparable seismotectonics to the Himalayas (continental compression). A set of 201 records … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In India, due to scarcity of strong motion data, there are few region or site-specific GMPEs. In the present study, we used three well-accepted GMPEs developed for different regions of the world: those developed by Sharma et al [16], Boore and Atkinson [17], and Akkar and Bommer [18]. Sharma et al [16] developed GMPEs for the Himalayan regions of India using data from the Himalayas and the Zagros regions, on the premise that the seismotectonics of the two regions have considerable similarity.…”
Section: B Ground Motion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In India, due to scarcity of strong motion data, there are few region or site-specific GMPEs. In the present study, we used three well-accepted GMPEs developed for different regions of the world: those developed by Sharma et al [16], Boore and Atkinson [17], and Akkar and Bommer [18]. Sharma et al [16] developed GMPEs for the Himalayan regions of India using data from the Himalayas and the Zagros regions, on the premise that the seismotectonics of the two regions have considerable similarity.…”
Section: B Ground Motion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we used three well-accepted GMPEs developed for different regions of the world: those developed by Sharma et al [16], Boore and Atkinson [17], and Akkar and Bommer [18]. Sharma et al [16] developed GMPEs for the Himalayan regions of India using data from the Himalayas and the Zagros regions, on the premise that the seismotectonics of the two regions have considerable similarity. Boore and Atkinson [17] developed GMPEs for active tectonic regions across the world, and Akkar and Bommer [18] developed GMPEs for active tectonic regions of Europe and the Middle East.…”
Section: B Ground Motion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, from the weighted combination of the results obtained from the tree logic, the peak ground acceleration of the Amol and its suburbs is calculated. This logic tree of eight relationships with the weights assigned is expressed in Figure 7 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Using the above mentioned authentic, new and compatible attenuation relationships selected for the earthquakes occurred in the Amol area, the zoning maps of the horizontal peak ground accelerations are evaluated using the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and the results are represented in Figures 8 and 9 for a risk of 10% and 2% in a life time 50 years (475 and 2475 years return period, similar to Iranian standard No.…”
Section: Zoning Of Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration For Amol Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He released his relationship based on 468 three-component strong motion data from five large earthquakes occurred in Iran, namely: Manjil, (1990), Sirach (1981), Golbaf (1980), Tabas (1979) and Naghan (1978). Also, Ghodrati et al in 2007 and [19,20], Sharma et al in 2009 [21], Yazdani and Kowsari in 2013 [22], and Campbell and Bozorgnia in 2014 [23] suggested new attenuation relations for PGA and PGV based on update data from earthquakes in Iran, with different coefficients for different parts of Iran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%