In recent years, it has been documented that climatic variability influences hydrological processes; however, these influences, such as hydrologic dynamics, have not yet been incorporated into models, which have been assumed as stationary with regard to climatic conditions. In this study, the temporal variability of hydrological processes and their influence on the water balance of a mountainous and data-sparse catchment in Chile are observed and modeled through the comparison of a stationary (time-invariant parameters) and dynamic (time-variant parameters) model. Since conceptual models are the most adequate option for a data-scarce basin, a conceptual model integrated with the Monte Carlo Analysis Toolbox is used to perform the analyses. Simple analyses aimed at increasing the amount of information obtained from models were used. The General and Dynamic Identifiability Analyses were used to perform stationary and dynamic calibration strategies, respectively. As a result we concluded that the dynamic model is more robust than the stationary one. Additionally, DYNIA helped us to observe the temporal variability of hydrological processes. This analysis contributed to a better understanding of hydrological processes in a data-sparse Andean catchment and thus could potentially help reduce uncertainties in the outputs of hydrological models under scenarios of climate change and/or variability. hydrological modeling comes into play, since it is one of the most used tools for water resources management and planning [2].Currently, there are many tools to support water resources planning and management. In particular, conceptual hydrological models have been widely used by the hydrological community [3,4] to provide a better understanding of hydrological processes [5], to estimate long-term water availability [6], and to make projections of climate [7][8][9] and land use change [10,11], among other uses. However, there is still a need not only to reproduce the past behavior of a basin, but also to evaluate the representativeness of the chosen model and its processes to assess the quality of the simulations for a given basin. This must be done not