Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation‐Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies

Abstract

Is greenwashing a concept describing companies using misleading communication or is it co‐constructed in the eye of the beholder? By discussing the literature, we find that existing definitions of greenwashing overemphasize the strategic intention to mislead and do not incorporate unjust allegations. Then, by combining signaling theory with legitimacy theory, we frame the communication process of the greenwashing accusation and the emergence of a negative narrative caused by the accusation and its effect on legitimacy. Hence, in this paper we argue that greenwashing epistemologically is constituted in the eye of the beholder, depending on an external accusation. Following this view, the greenwashing accusation is understood as a distortion factor altering the signal reliability of green messages. Based on our conceptual analysis, we provide a conceptual framework introducing a new typology of case‐based greenwashing (greenwashing, false greenwashing, potential greenwashing and no greenwashing) and the effects of these types on corporate legitimacy. Finally, we propose a revised definition of greenwashing as co‐creation of an external accusation toward an organization with regard to presenting a misleading green message. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions

“…Despite growing interest from academics and professionals, there is no generally accepted definition of greenwashing in the current literature. Due to its interdisciplinary nature, different definitions and perspectives have been adopted by scholars in the analysis of greenwashing practices (Guo, Tao, Li, & Wang, ; Nyilasy, Gangadharbatla, & Paladino, ; Roulet & Touboul, ; Seele & Gatti, ; Wilson, Robinson, & Darke, ). In describing greenwashing, several scholars base themselves on the definition of the Oxford English Dictionary, others adopt the TerraChoice perspective, and others elaborate their own definition (Delmas & Burbano, ; Lyon & Montgomery, ; Walker & Wan, ).…”

What Makes a Business Ethicist? A Reflection on the Transition from Applied Philosophy to Critical Thinking

“…Nevertheless, as discussed above, these fields could also be addressed from a merely instrumental and strategic approach to maximize profit or as an impression management public relations (PR) exercise falling under the category of greenwashing (Seele and Gatti 2015). Critical thinking instead helps to challenge different notions and contest business activities as not serving the best sort of life and offers mental models, moral imagination, and system thinking, as Werhane (2008) put it.…”

SA8000 as CSR‐Washing? The Role of Stakeholder Pressures

“…Seele and Gatti, 2015), CSR-washing remains an emerging and under-researched topic. Unlike greenwashing (e.g.…”