Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Cropping and Grazed Pastures Are Similar: A Simulation Analysis in Australia

Abstract

The agricultural sector has potential to provide greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation by sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC). Replacing cropland with permanent pasture is one practice promoted for its potential to sequester soil carbon. However, pastures frequently support livestock, which produce other GHG emissions that could negate the abatement from increased SOC, especially given the declining rate of SOC sequestration through time. Our purpose was to determine whether the abatement provided by SOC storage in permanent pastures was offset by livestock emissions, and to thus compare emissions from grazed pasture systems with those from cropping systems. We investigated this question for three case study farms in locations with contrasting climate, soils and management representative of Australian cropping and livestock systems. Three cropping scenarios were defined that had increasing amounts of SOC inputs: Crop burn , crop residues burned before sowing (lowest SOC input); Crop stubble , crop residues retained; and Crop intensity , uncropped fallow phases replaced with short-term green manure legume crops. The on-farm GHG emissions profiles of these cropping scenarios were compared with those from two livestock scenarios utilizing continuous stocking: Livestock grass , stocked permanent grass pasture; and Livestock legume , stocked permanent legume pasture; the latter having higher SOC input than the former. Crop yields, pasture growth rates and emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from the soil were simulated with the APSIM farming systems model. Livestock emissions were predicted using Australian GHG accounting emission factors. For the farms in this study, the SOC sequestered in the stocked permanent pastures was offset by emissions from livestock, and emissions from cropping scenarios were similar to or significantly less than those from the livestock scenarios. These findings: (1) demonstrate the importance of using net GHG abatement potentials from combined emissions rather than a single GHG abatement process when evaluating potential abatement practices, and (2) demonstrate that characteristics of different locations can alter the abatement potential of management practices.

Effect of straw retention on carbon footprint under different cropping sequences in Northeast China

“…Various cropland management practices affect the mineralization of soil organic matter and alter carbon emissions. Moreover, differences inputs of chemical fertilizers, human activities, and fuels create variation in carbon emissions from agricultural inputs under different management practices, indirectly influencing the energy consumption and carbon cycling of systems (Li et al 2002 ; Lal 2004 ; Larsen and Hertwich 2011 ; Wang et al 2015a ; Zhang et al 2015 ; Meier et al 2020 ). The carbon footprint (CF), the impact of carbon emissions on the global environment, is an assessment of direct or indirect CO 2 emissions caused by particular activities or estimated cumulatively during the life cycles of particular products (Peters 2010 ; Duan et al 2011 ; Adewale et al 2019 ).…”

Current approaches for modeling ecosystem services and biodiversity in agroforestry systems: Challenges and ways forward

“…Yield-SAFE estimated that 28% of N leaching can be reduced in high-risk areas but this also depends on the tree density (Palma et al, 2007a), as N leaching is modeled using the equation proposed by Feldwisch, in which the soil water exchange factor and leaching are estimated from excess nitrogen. Yield-SAFE was found to predict lower N leaching levels based on the competition in the tree-crop interactions, using a model of the downstream approach that did not consider N dynamics, i.e., the relationship with yield, but further tests are required in different AF systems and under contrasting environments (Meier et al, 2020). Similarly, Hi-SAFE has the potential to simulate N leaching in AFS (Burke and Poncé-Hernandez, 2014;Cardinael et al, 2018).…”

An Assessment of the Interaction between Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Available Nutrients from the Lifecycle of Several Agricultural Crops

“…Utilizing renewable energy sources can replace fossil fuels, lowering both on-and off-farm greenhouse gas emissions. The following renewable energy sources are appropriate for use on farms: geothermal, solar energy systems, anaerobic digestion, wind turbines, soil conservation, solar panels, carbon sequestration and reducing greenhouse gas emissions (Meier et al, 2020). Ecosystems supporting agriculture store a significant amount of carbon, which reduces the emission of CO2.…”