2015
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20150049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing management in an integrated crop-livestock system: soybean development and grain yield

Abstract: -Grazing livestock in integrated crop-livestock systems can cause impacts in the subsequent crop cycle. Aiming to investigate how grazing could affect soybean, the 9th crop cycle of a pasture/soybean rotation was assessed. Treatments were grazing intensities (10, 20, 30 and 40 cm of sward height) applied since 2001 in a mixed of oat and annual ryegrass; and an additional no grazing area as control. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized block design with three replicates. Grazing affected soybean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of higher grazing intensities leads to spatially homogeneous canopy throughout the pasture phase, characterized mostly by excessively grazed vegetation with usual occurrence of bare soil. Furthermore, pasture cover at the end of the pasture phase affects weed infestation in the subsequent crop, since the lower the residual biomass covering the soil, the higher the incidence of weeds (Kunrath et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Grazing Process and Characteristics Inherent To The Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of higher grazing intensities leads to spatially homogeneous canopy throughout the pasture phase, characterized mostly by excessively grazed vegetation with usual occurrence of bare soil. Furthermore, pasture cover at the end of the pasture phase affects weed infestation in the subsequent crop, since the lower the residual biomass covering the soil, the higher the incidence of weeds (Kunrath et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Grazing Process and Characteristics Inherent To The Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, long-term experimental results on possible interaction effects between system components are not yet available for integrated systems containing tree crops in Mato Grosso. In the case of crop-livestock interactions, short-term experiments have already been conducted in conditions similar to those of our study area (Landers 2007;Flores et al 2007;Silva et al 2012;Kunrath et al 2015) and suggest that the magnitude of shortterm profitability effects is rather small. Given such limited evidence, we opted for not including any interaction effects in our present model implementation.…”
Section: Implementation Of Integrated Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for the height of the soybean plants in the 2012/2013 harvest were not significant and the height was 104.48 cm in the plots with one grazing, 104.13 cm in non-grazed plots and 93.75 cm in the plots with two grazings (Table 3). That is, considering the hypothesis that this has occurred because of the lower amount of DM due to grazing (Table 2) (Santos et al, 2013), or of effects on soil porosity due to the presence of animals (Flores et al, 2007;Flores & Tracy, 2012) and the water deficit period (Lopes et al, 2009), this situation tends to gradually reduce with the use of the crop rotation system in three to four years (Calonego et al, 2010), or grazing with residual height of more than 0.10 m (Kunrath et al, 2015), as can be seen in the 2013/2014 harvest (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%