2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphitization of amorphous carbons: A comparative study of interatomic potentials

Abstract: We perform a comparative study of six common carbon interatomic potentials: Tersoff, REBO-II, ReaxFF, EDIP, LCBOP-I and COMB3. To ensure fair comparison, all the potentials are used as implemented in the molecular dynamics package LAMMPS. Using the liquid quenching method we generate amorphous carbons at different densities, and subsequently anneal at high temperature. The amorphous carbon system provides a critical test of the transferability of the potential, while the annealing simulations illustrate the gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
184
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
9
184
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This study examined the carbon hybridization, ring formation, and pore size distribution as a function of density and quench rate, and demonstrated the potential that ReaxFF could be effective in generating model CDCs; however, the study was not explicitly focused on the formation of experimentally relevant CDCs. EDIP, which has been shown to exhibit similar behavior to ReaxFF at low density [67], has been used to generate CDCs via removal of metal atoms from a carbide lattice and subsequent annealing at the target density, showing close agreement with experimental pore size distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study examined the carbon hybridization, ring formation, and pore size distribution as a function of density and quench rate, and demonstrated the potential that ReaxFF could be effective in generating model CDCs; however, the study was not explicitly focused on the formation of experimentally relevant CDCs. EDIP, which has been shown to exhibit similar behavior to ReaxFF at low density [67], has been used to generate CDCs via removal of metal atoms from a carbide lattice and subsequent annealing at the target density, showing close agreement with experimental pore size distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Carbon-based materials, and CDCs in particular, present a unique challenge for these forcefields because of their nanoscale heterogeneity. Individual forcefields can sufficiently describe specific structural moeities, such as short-range graphitization at low density [67], but are often not sufficient to capture the full range of non-ideal features observed in CDCs [68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 These fast potentials make large-scale moleculardynamics (MD) simulations possible, and have been applied to engineering problems such as fracture 17 or friction and wear of ta-C coatings;…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 its choice depends on the computational method, 8 and a suitable annealing temperature must therefore be found by trial and error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulations use the Environment Dependent Interatomic Potential (EDIP) [41] for carbon. EDIP has been successful in MD simulations of graphitization processes [42,43,44,45,46] and in HRMC and MC models of nanoporous carbon. [36,30,47,31] To bridge the gap between the experimental and simulation timescale we develop an Arrhenius framework which allows correlation between the experimental and simulation temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%