2013
DOI: 10.1021/jp308861b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-Induced Substrate Decoupling and Ideal Doping of a Self-Assembled Iron-phthalocyanine Single Layer

Abstract: Iron-phthalocyanine molecules self-assemble on the moiré pattern of graphene/Ir(111) as a flat and weakly interacting layer, as determined by core-level photoemission and absorption spectroscopy. The graphene buffer layer decouples the FePc two-dimensional structure from the underlying metal; the electronic structure of the FePc molecular macrocycles is preserved; and the Fe-L2,3 edges present narrower and slightly modified resonances at the FePc single-layer coverage with respect to a thin film. The FePc laye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
106
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
16
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HOMO if is at almost the same energy for both FePc and CoPc SLs and it has been attributed to the macrocycle interaction through the π a 1u orbitals with the Au d states. 6 It is worth noticing that FePc on graphene/Ir does not show a shift in the a 1u molecular orbital, 8 owing to the very low interaction of FePc with the graphene/Ir substrate. The interface I 0 peak lies at 0.21 eV and 0.73 eV eV BE for the FePc-SL and the CoPc-SL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The HOMO if is at almost the same energy for both FePc and CoPc SLs and it has been attributed to the macrocycle interaction through the π a 1u orbitals with the Au d states. 6 It is worth noticing that FePc on graphene/Ir does not show a shift in the a 1u molecular orbital, 8 owing to the very low interaction of FePc with the graphene/Ir substrate. The interface I 0 peak lies at 0.21 eV and 0.73 eV eV BE for the FePc-SL and the CoPc-SL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The estimated activation energy (2.27 eV) is in very good agreement with the activation energy obtained for MPcs multi-layer desorption from graphene/Ir (2.2-2.4 eV), where the MPc molecules also pile-up face-on onto the graphene surface. 8,36,37 Thus, the TF desorption temperature is independent of the central metal ion, and of the substrate, once the MPc molecules assemble in planar layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, in both BG and SG, there is no significant shift (<0.02 eV) in the position of the graphene σ band with respect to E F after ZnPc deposition [35], implying that the graphene is not significantly doped by ZnPc. For comparison, previous work finds that, when FePc is deposited on graphene, ground-state charge transfer from FePc to graphene causes the Fermi level to shift up only by 0.08 eV [46]. The doping effect of ZnPc is expected to be even less due to the much weaker molecule-substrate interaction compared to that of FePc [47].…”
Section: A Energy-level Alignment At the Interfacementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Graphene and h-BN monolayers between the metal substrate and the adsorbed molecules can lead to a partial electronic decoupling when the metal substrate is weakly interacting, such as Ir(1 1 1) [584,628], whereas substantial residual coupling was observed for more strongly interacting substrates such as Ni(1 1 1) and Ru(0 0 0 1) [582,583,585,[598][599][600]612].…”
Section: Graphene and Boron Nitridementioning
confidence: 99%