2007
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.143.7.946
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Granuloma Annulare: Long-term Follow-up

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
22
1
0
0

Citation Types

1
6
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
17
6

Relationship

0
23

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 23 publications

(7 citation statements)
references

References 3 publications

1
6
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, the incidence and prevalence of granuloma annulare were highest in the fifth decade of life, which is consistent with several prior studies suggesting that it is most commonly reported in the first 3 to 5 decades of life . However, there are a few small, single-center case series suggesting that granuloma annulare may also be common among children, although these studies lack a denominator, making it difficult to establish accurate incidence and prevalence estimates .…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…3,14,16,17 In this study, the incidence and prevalence of granuloma annulare were highest in the fifth decade of life, which is consistent with several prior studies suggesting that it is most commonly reported in the first 3 to 5 decades of life. 3,4,21,22 However, there are a few small, single-center case series suggesting that granuloma annulare may also be common among children, although these studies lack a denominator, making it difficult to establish accurate incidence and prevalence estimates. 5,9,17 Because the subcutaneous variant of granuloma annulare has been reported to be more common among children, it is also possible that these discrepancies may be associated with differences between granuloma annulare definitions used in each study.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this study, the incidence and prevalence of granuloma annulare were highest in the fifth decade of life, which is consistent with several prior studies suggesting that it is most commonly reported in the first 3 to 5 decades of life . However, there are a few small, single-center case series suggesting that granuloma annulare may also be common among children, although these studies lack a denominator, making it difficult to establish accurate incidence and prevalence estimates .…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…3,14,16,17 In this study, the incidence and prevalence of granuloma annulare were highest in the fifth decade of life, which is consistent with several prior studies suggesting that it is most commonly reported in the first 3 to 5 decades of life. 3,4,21,22 However, there are a few small, single-center case series suggesting that granuloma annulare may also be common among children, although these studies lack a denominator, making it difficult to establish accurate incidence and prevalence estimates. 5,9,17 Because the subcutaneous variant of granuloma annulare has been reported to be more common among children, it is also possible that these discrepancies may be associated with differences between granuloma annulare definitions used in each study.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In our case, proper control of T1DM did not affect the course of skin lesions that have slowly spread on the skin within 5 years. Dahl in 2007 [ 13 ] presented a report with long-term follow-up of Mayo Clinic records of patients with GA. All patients have had follow-up visits of at least 20 years (with the mean follow-up of 35 years). Three out of 32 (9.4%) patients have had or have developed T1DM during the follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…7 The prevalence of other comorbidities, such as hypertension, obesity, and thyroid, cardiovascular, and malignant disease, has not been systematically investigated. Data from uncontrolled studies 1,3 and case series 8 have not been validated by large-scale controlled studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%