2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granting airport concessions for regional development: Evidence from Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third and last, this paper analyses M alaga airport and its hinterland, but the airlines that operate in this destination did not show interest in participating in this study. Following Aguirre et al (2019) suggest that airport activity has been linked with economic development in urban areas, and with their improved facilities (by construction or expansion), given the importance of connecting territories and the positive externalities for society.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third and last, this paper analyses M alaga airport and its hinterland, but the airlines that operate in this destination did not show interest in participating in this study. Following Aguirre et al (2019) suggest that airport activity has been linked with economic development in urban areas, and with their improved facilities (by construction or expansion), given the importance of connecting territories and the positive externalities for society.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a wide variety of studies on the numerous ripple effects of airports on local economies. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Oosterhaven et al 34 analyzed the regional interindustry relations between urban areas and rural areas where two Dutch mainports (Rotterdam Harbour and Schiphol Airport) are located by utilizing the Input Output analysis methodology. They examined the relationship between an airport and the local economies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Bel and Fageda (2010) Non-regulated private airports charge higher prices than public or regulated airports. Rolim et al (2016) , Aguirre et al (2019) Privatisation has caused traffic growth …”
Section: Measures Of Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed Assaf and Gillen (2012) found that it was regulation rather than ownership that is the key driver of performance, Adler and Liebert (2014) observed that private versus public performance varied according to the level of competition, and Bel and Fageda (2010) found that privatised airports had higher aeronautical fees than public ones, but only when not regulated. Finally, in connection to traffic and competition, it is interesting that both Rolim et al (2016) and Aguirre et al (2019) all observed higher traffic volumes after privatisation which Rolim et al argued could be as the result of privatised airports being more effective in producing routes developments strategies, such as route support and risk sharing with existing and new airlines.…”
Section: Measures Of Successmentioning
confidence: 99%