Grafting of Skin and Oral Mucosa in the Oral and Maxillofacial Regions

Hillerup, Søren

doi:10.1016/s1042-3699(20)30723-8

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relevant literature is rich with several methods, several procedures, different exogenous materials, and soft tissue grafts, free or pedicled, to obtain primary closure of the extraction sockets after bone augmentation. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] This study compares with and without cut back incision technique to obtain and maintain primary closure in extraction sites augmented with particulate bone substitute in attempts to preserve the socket. This technique offers several advantages over the different methods and materials used to achieve primary soft tissue closure of grafted extraction sites.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness with cutback incision and without cut back incision technique on healing in patients between 18 to 65 years of age for socket preservation cases: A randomized controlled trial

Gangar

Benjamin²,

Phadnis³

et al. 2021

IJPI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Primary closure is the most important step following tooth extraction. Primary closure using cut back incision technique helps in preserving the bone graft in socket and to preserve it in their desired position. To assess the healing outcome with and without cut back incision technique in adult population for the purpose of socket preservation at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial forty-two sites were planned for extraction with bone augmentation and were randomly divided. In group 1 sockets were preserved using cutback incision technique and in group 2 sockets were grafted without cutback incision technique. Clinical standardized measurements were used to assess the dimensional alterations of the extraction socket. Various non-parametric tests have been used for comparisons. Intergroup comparison showed statistical higher difference on Pain on VAS (p >0.00 6) and KGW (p 0.039) at 1 week and primary healing showed no significant results at all time intervals. The present finding concluded that use of cutback incision technique enhances primary closure and the socket seal of the extraction site with minimal pain, morbidity and low cost.

show abstract