2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design

Abstract: Public policy, Policy tools, Governing instruments, Policy design,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
333
0
44

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(382 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
333
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…Private and hybrid implementation modes represent a set of government preferences for markets in goods and service delivery, and are assumed to represent the choice of the "best" implementation mode that "matches" the overarching policy goals (Howlett 2009;Lytton and McAllister 2014;Saetren 2014). However, multiple policy design elements act in a complex interplay and can undermine one another in the pursuit of policy goals (Howlett and Rayner 2007;Howlett 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Private and hybrid implementation modes represent a set of government preferences for markets in goods and service delivery, and are assumed to represent the choice of the "best" implementation mode that "matches" the overarching policy goals (Howlett 2009;Lytton and McAllister 2014;Saetren 2014). However, multiple policy design elements act in a complex interplay and can undermine one another in the pursuit of policy goals (Howlett and Rayner 2007;Howlett 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, multiple policy design elements act in a complex interplay and can undermine one another in the pursuit of policy goals (Howlett and Rayner 2007;Howlett 2009). We thus formulate contrasting hypotheses on how three major design factors interact with conflicting logics on output performance, from both a topdown, "design" perspective (Howlett 2009) and from a bottom-up, "implementation" standpoint (Saetren 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different parts of the policy process can be considered when analysing policy integration (Howlett, 2009). The present study focuses on the internal characteristics of the policy process, here called problem definitions, policy goals, and policy measures (cf.…”
Section: A Theoretical Framework For Analysing the Policy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a regime approach draws attention to economic and institutional commonalities between countries and is therefore apt to supplement the dichotomous relationship between national markets and the Single Market (cf. Howlett 2009;John 2013;Wison 2010). Testing the approach empirically with data from the European Commission's Consumer Market Monitoring Surveys also reveals whether the heritage of national economies and institutions still dominates market performance or if markets have become Europeanized in the form of a Single Market.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%