2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

Abstract: Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
565
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 659 publications
(570 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
4
565
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverse solver used to localize the sources was then applied on the averaged normed evoked data. The normalization procedure was done to alleviate source cancellation when averaging sources within a label of interest, and across subjects (Gross et al, 2013). The comparisons of evoked responses between conditions were computed using a non-parametric permutation test.…”
Section: Event-related Fields and Source Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse solver used to localize the sources was then applied on the averaged normed evoked data. The normalization procedure was done to alleviate source cancellation when averaging sources within a label of interest, and across subjects (Gross et al, 2013). The comparisons of evoked responses between conditions were computed using a non-parametric permutation test.…”
Section: Event-related Fields and Source Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no overlap between the selected epochs. Visual inspection was preferred over automatic approaches, since these may introduce complex new artifacts or biases [8].…”
Section: Eeg Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite these disadvantages, subtractive baseline correction may be Manuscript in preparation [v1.1.3;Fri Jan 13 12:31:19 2017;#324bb4c] the natural choice for some researchers because it is the standard approach in EEG research (e.g. Gross et al, 2013;Woodman, 2010).…”
Section: Of 25mentioning
confidence: 99%