2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-022-03121-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gold Prospecting Mapping in the Peninsular Malaysia Gold Belts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical field data acquisition was carried out using ABEM SAB4000 Terrameter land imaging equipment in combination with auto selection ABEM ES 10–64 unit. The RES2-D ERT surveys were accomplished at 5 m electrode constant spacing, using 61 metal steel electrodes via two reels of multi-core cables [ 37 , 40 ]. A microcomputer unit was incorporated to the ABEM ES 10–64 selector as a switcher unit, which automatically pick-out four energized electrodes promptly, was used for each measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geophysical field data acquisition was carried out using ABEM SAB4000 Terrameter land imaging equipment in combination with auto selection ABEM ES 10–64 unit. The RES2-D ERT surveys were accomplished at 5 m electrode constant spacing, using 61 metal steel electrodes via two reels of multi-core cables [ 37 , 40 ]. A microcomputer unit was incorporated to the ABEM ES 10–64 selector as a switcher unit, which automatically pick-out four energized electrodes promptly, was used for each measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [ 37 ]. Since observed groundwater levels within an aquifer unit are non-continuous in a given time and space, the results obtained from RES2-D and IP alone are inadequate to model the groundwater estimated volume, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several geophysical methods exist, in this study, the sensitivity of the method (for the detection and location of horizontal and vertical structures or bodies), the type of mineralization sought (metallic sulphides), the depth of the targets (near surface), the geological environment (site constituted by ancient sedimentary deposits) and geomorphological environment (topographic variation), the deposit mode (diffuse or disseminated) and the area of investigation are a set of factors that justify, as in most studies (Gouet et al., 2013; Gündoğdu et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2021; Sağır et al., 2020), the choice of the electrical method as the ideal approach for this study. The choice of using the direct current (DC) and induced polarization (IP) electrical methods over the self‐potential method is not only due to their good accuracy and depth of investigation but also to their affinity in the detection of a particular type of mineralization (clays, metal sulphides, graphite and certain metal oxides such as magnetite) (Chouteau, 2006; Claude et al., 2014; Gouet et al., 2013; Kayode et al., 2022; Lenhare & Moreira, 2020; Martin et al., 2020; Shirazi et al., 2022; Silva et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022). Moreover, with these two methods, the electrical tomography technique (acquisition in vertical sections of electrical data) can be easily used, and the different tomographic sections obtained after data processing can be used in 3D modelling and preliminary estimation of the volume of anomalies (Embeng et al., 2022; Martin et al., 2020; Moreira et al., 2019; Yan et al., 2018; Ya‐wei et al., 2015).…”
Section: Data Acquisition Used and Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IP and ERT are commonly used in geological and mining prospecting to indicate the presence of metal sulphides, metal oxides, clays and other old buried mine sites in the ground (Bharti et al., 2016; Bharti et al., 2019; Claude et al., 2014; Das et al., 2017; Gündoğdu et al., 2022; Horo et al., 2020; Kayode et al., 2022; Moreira et al., 2019; Shirazi et al., 2022; Silva et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2019; Zaid et al., 2022). Other studies use these methods for the 3D modelling of geoelectric anomalies corresponding to the targets sought (Embeng et al., 2022; Kayode et al., 2022; Lenhare & Moreira, 2020; Martin et al., 2020; Moreira et al., 2019; Sağır et al., 2020; Ya‐wei et al., 2015). This modelling can be done either by 3D inversion of the tomography data using inversion software (Zondres3D, Res3DInv, UBC and others) or by 3D correlation of the interpretation results of the different inverted sections using specific software (Oasis montaj, GeoModeller, RockWorks, GeoScene3D and others).…”
Section: Data Acquisition Used and Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation