2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-018-0789-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glyphosate detection: methods, needs and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
0
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stock solutions containing either one or the two analytes at 200 mg/L in 0.1 M HCl were prepared. Acidification with HCl to pH 1 has been found to be necessary in the case of environmental samples since multivalent cations form stable complexes with GLP and AMPA, which are not derivatized [11,20,[25][26][27]32,33]. All standard and working solutions were stored at 4 • C in polypropylene material given that GLP binds to active sites on glass when it is not derivatized [22,24,27].…”
Section: Reagents and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stock solutions containing either one or the two analytes at 200 mg/L in 0.1 M HCl were prepared. Acidification with HCl to pH 1 has been found to be necessary in the case of environmental samples since multivalent cations form stable complexes with GLP and AMPA, which are not derivatized [11,20,[25][26][27]32,33]. All standard and working solutions were stored at 4 • C in polypropylene material given that GLP binds to active sites on glass when it is not derivatized [22,24,27].…”
Section: Reagents and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different analytical methods previously employed to determine Glyp were comprehensively reviewed in the literature, [11][12][13] and most of them are based on chromatographic techniques. [14][15][16][17] These techniques are highly sensitive and can detect Glyp well below the defined guidelines in the targeted samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the properties above-mentioned, maximum residue thresholds of glyphosate are established at the very low concentration especially for drinking water (0.1 μg/L or 0.6 nM, in European countries) [ 30 ]. Liquid chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry are traditional methods for glyphosate analysis [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. However, the ionic and water-soluble proprieties of glyphosate make the analysis by HPLC advantageous over GC [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%