2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11101-008-9105-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucosinolates and biofumigation: fate of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
144
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
144
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches, such as the use of pathogen-suppressive soils, organic amendments, and biological fumigation, have identified potentially useful mechanisms that can be exploited through plant breeding. Glucosinolate, which is produced by canola and decomposes in soil to produce compounds found in commercial soil fumigants effective against soil-borne pathogens, is an example (Gimsing and Kirkegaard 2009). Breeding can increase root exudation and rhizodeposition to selectively enrich species and communities of pathogen-suppressive microbes or better fortify roots to stop or reduce infection.…”
Section: Adaptation To New Pests and Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches, such as the use of pathogen-suppressive soils, organic amendments, and biological fumigation, have identified potentially useful mechanisms that can be exploited through plant breeding. Glucosinolate, which is produced by canola and decomposes in soil to produce compounds found in commercial soil fumigants effective against soil-borne pathogens, is an example (Gimsing and Kirkegaard 2009). Breeding can increase root exudation and rhizodeposition to selectively enrich species and communities of pathogen-suppressive microbes or better fortify roots to stop or reduce infection.…”
Section: Adaptation To New Pests and Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Highest glucosinolate content was found in the WIN leaf material, followed by PSB and SAV during optimal biofumigation practices (maximum tissue disruption and water addition) up to 100 nmol ITC per gram soil can be released in the soil, while a release efficacy of approximately 60 % could be measured under field conditions (Gimsing and Kirkegaard 2009). In our study, the amounts potentially released were estimated to reach 88 nmol 3-butenyl ITC (derived from gluconapin, 3-butenyl GSL) per gram of soil (calculated via 1 % DW plant material compared to DW soil, with an average of 14.65 μmol gluconapin per gram of DW plant material and assuming the same conversion efficiency).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One percent of freeze-dried leaf material relative to total soil (on a dry weight (DW)/DW base) was used for biofumigation. Leaf material was completely fragmented using a laboratory blender (IKA, A11 basic) to ensure maximum tissue rupture and, in turn, GSL release efficiency and hydrolysis potential (Gimsing and Kirkegaard 2009).…”
Section: Biofumigation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of isothiocyanates is responsible for their efficacy: the more volatile the compound, the greater its antibiological activity due to better distribution. The type of microorganisms being combated, and even the particular phase of their growth, is also important [25]. The mode of action behind AITC's antimicrobial activity is not yet fully understood, but since it might penetrate membranes and no single site of action has been described, it is generally regarded as a non-specific inhibitor of periplasmic or intracellular targets.…”
Section: Comparison Of Chemical Composition Antioxidant and Antimicrmentioning
confidence: 99%