2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03465-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology

Abstract: Members of the International Skeletal Society compiled a glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology. The authors also represent national radiology or pathology societies in Asia, Australia, Europe, and the USA. We provide brief descriptions of musculoskeletal structures, disease processes, and syndromes and address their imaging features. Given the abundance of musculoskeletal disorders and derangements, we chose to omit most terms relating to neoplasm, spine, intervention, and pediatrics. Consensus agree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently available data from formal comparisons between NR and SR are based on subjective (perceived quality questionnaires) and objective (key imaging findings reported) evaluations performed retrospectively, which do not provide the desirable level of evidence to confirm the urgency for a widespread adoption of structured reporting. It is possible that the same advantages of SR use could be obtained by proper education of subspecialty radiologists and promoting the use of standardized lexicon and validated scoring systems without the need for actual structuring of reports, therefore defending the autonomy of radiologists [ 81 ]. It could also be argued that multidisciplinary meetings and radiologist consultations might be a different feasible solution to increase the value and impact of our work [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available data from formal comparisons between NR and SR are based on subjective (perceived quality questionnaires) and objective (key imaging findings reported) evaluations performed retrospectively, which do not provide the desirable level of evidence to confirm the urgency for a widespread adoption of structured reporting. It is possible that the same advantages of SR use could be obtained by proper education of subspecialty radiologists and promoting the use of standardized lexicon and validated scoring systems without the need for actual structuring of reports, therefore defending the autonomy of radiologists [ 81 ]. It could also be argued that multidisciplinary meetings and radiologist consultations might be a different feasible solution to increase the value and impact of our work [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MO develops through three distinct phases that lead to a characteristic 'zone phenomenon' observed on histological tissue samples. 21 The zones are divided into a well organised mature lamellar bone surrounding the periphery, an intermediate osteoid region and a central immature non-ossified fibroblastic focus. The phases of transition of MO usually last over an average of three months.…”
Section: Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 4 Additionally, serous marrow does not enhance after administration of intravenous contrast, differentiating it from diffuse infiltrating malignancy. 8 …”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%