2011
DOI: 10.1214/10-aos836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global uniform risk bounds for wavelet deconvolution estimators

Abstract: We consider the statistical deconvolution problem where one observes $n$ replications from the model $Y=X+\epsilon$, where $X$ is the unobserved random signal of interest and $\epsilon$ is an independent random error with distribution $\phi$. Under weak assumptions on the decay of the Fourier transform of $\phi,$ we derive upper bounds for the finite-sample sup-norm risk of wavelet deconvolution density estimators $f_n$ for the density $f$ of $X$, where $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is assumed to be bounded. We… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proof of sup-norm lower bound for NPIV models is similar to that of Chen and Reiss (2011) for L 2 -norm lower bound. Similar sup-norm lower bounds for density deconvolution were recently obtained by Lounici and Nickl (2011).…”
Section: Lower Boundssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our proof of sup-norm lower bound for NPIV models is similar to that of Chen and Reiss (2011) for L 2 -norm lower bound. Similar sup-norm lower bounds for density deconvolution were recently obtained by Lounici and Nickl (2011).…”
Section: Lower Boundssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…If α = 0 the same bound was obtained in Goldenshluger and Lepski (2014) and the asymptotics found in the first assertion is the minimax rate of convergence, see Lepski (2013). In the univariate case d = 1, if α = 1, and r = ∞ (Hölder class) the first assertion of the theorem was proved in Lounici and Nickl (2011). Nikol'skii spaces, Nikol'skii (1977), Section 6.9, the condition τ (∞) > 0 guarantees that all the functions belonging to …”
Section: Bounds For Thesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…They also establish an upper bound under the additional assumptions that 1 ≤ r ≤ 2, µ < r 2−r (β + 1 2 − 1 r ) and f has a fixed compact support. Lounici and Nickl (2011) examined the case of the L ∞ -loss. They obtain a lower and an upper bound for the minimax risk over the class of Holder spaces Σ = B ( β, ∞, ∞, L ) with β > 0, but they remark that the results can be generalized to the class of Besov spaces Σ = B ( β, r, q, L ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to establish the validity of bootstrap confidence bands, researchers relied on the existence of continuous limit distributions of normalized suprema of original studentized processes. In the deconvolution density estimation problem, [28] considered confidence bands without using Gaussian approximation. In the current density estimation problem, their idea reads as bounding the deviation probability of f n −E[f n (·)] ∞ by using Talagrand's [38] inequality and replacing the expected supremum by the Rademacher average.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%