Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 comparative risk assessment (CRA) is a comprehensive approach to risk factor quantification that offers a useful tool for synthesising evidence on risks and risk–outcome associations. With each annual GBD study, we update the GBD CRA to incorporate improved methods, new risks and risk–outcome pairs, and new data on risk exposure levels and risk–outcome associations.MethodsWe used the CRA framework developed for previous iterations of GBD to estimate levels and trends in exposure, attributable deaths, and attributable disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), by age group, sex, year, and location for 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or groups of risks from 1990 to 2017. This study included 476 risk–outcome pairs that met the GBD study criteria for convincing or probable evidence of causation. We extracted relative risk and exposure estimates from 46 749 randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, household surveys, census data, satellite data, and other sources. We used statistical models to pool data, adjust for bias, and incorporate covariates. Using the counterfactual scenario of theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL), we estimated the portion of deaths and DALYs that could be attributed to a given risk. We explored the relationship between development and risk exposure by modelling the relationship between the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) and risk-weighted exposure prevalence and estimated expected levels of exposure and risk-attributable burden by SDI. Finally, we explored temporal changes in risk-attributable DALYs by decomposing those changes into six main component drivers of change as follows: (1) population growth; (2) changes in population age structures; (3) changes in exposure to environmental and occupational risks; (4) changes in exposure to behavioural risks; (5) changes in exposure to metabolic risks; and (6) changes due to all other factors, approximated as the risk-deleted death and DALY rates, where the risk-deleted rate is the rate that would be observed had we reduced the exposure levels to the TMREL for all risk factors included in GBD 2017.FindingsIn 2017, 34·1 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 33·3–35·0) deaths and 1·21 billion (1·14–1·28) DALYs were attributable to GBD risk factors. Globally, 61·0% (59·6–62·4) of deaths and 48·3% (46·3–50·2) of DALYs were attributed to the GBD 2017 risk factors. When ranked by risk-attributable DALYs, high systolic blood pressure (SBP) was the leading risk factor, accounting for 10·4 million (9·39–11·5) deaths and 218 million (198–237) DALYs, followed by smoking (7·10 million [6·83–7·37] deaths and 182 million [173–193] DALYs), high fasting plasma glucose (6·53 million [5·23–8·23] deaths and 171 million [144–201] DALYs), high body-mass index (BMI; 4·72 million [2·99–6·70] deaths and 148 million [98·6–202] DALYs), and short gestation for birthweight (1·43 million [1·36–1·51] deaths and 139 million [131–147] DALYs). I...

The economic cost of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review of estimates and methods

“…Existing studies provide a compelling case to prioritise action on reducing the prevalence of lifestyle‐related risk factors; however, there are several gaps in the current evidence base. Several risk factors share joint causal responsibility for many non‐communicable diseases 7,42 . Evidence on the joint effects of multiple risk factors provides some of the evidence required to justify a national strategy to focus on the prevention of non‐communicable diseases; however, the last time the joint economic impact of lifestyle‐related risk factors for the whole Australian population was studied was 10 years ago 15–17,27,28 .…”

“…These five lifestyle‐related risk factors were selected based on the priorities of The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre who commissioned this work 6 . Four of these are also ranked in the top six risk factors of attributable health burden according to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, with low physical activity ranked 14th 7 . The National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database economic study filters designed by the National Institute for Health Research Centre for Reviews and Dissemination were used to isolate economic analyses 8 .…”

Blood pressure and risk of cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

“…Hypertension and cancer are complex multifactorial conditions. Hypertension is a worldwide public health challenge, with systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 115 mm Hg ranked as the leading risk factor for the global burden of disease in 2017 . The global age‐standardized prevalence of raised blood pressure (SBP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] ≥90 mm Hg) in adults was estimated as ≥20% in 2015 .…”

Toward a Resilient Global Society: Air, Sea Level, Earthquakes, and Weather

“…Air pollution is the leading environmental health risk factor (Stanaway et al, 2018) with over 90% of the global population breathing air that exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ; (Health Effects Institute, 2018). Air pollution is the leading environmental health risk factor (Stanaway et al, 2018) with over 90% of the global population breathing air that exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ; (Health Effects Institute, 2018).…”