2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jb021404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Frictional Equilibrium via Stochastic, Local Coulomb Frictional Slips

Abstract: A simple quasi-static 2D model simulates the global stress relaxation of fractured rock mass due to local frictional slips • The fractures in the rock mass are stochastically assigned with varying frictional coefficients, representing the system heterogeneity • Global stress evolution of the stochastic case differs from its deterministic counterpart, extending the notion of frictional equilibrium Supporting Information:

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture constitutive behavior in this study is independent of time, which ignores the significant evolution of fracture deformation with time (Brantut et al, 2013;Scholz, 1968). If time-dependent fracture behavior is considered, it is expected to further promote stress rotation and weaken the rock mass frictional strength in a temporal sense (Zhang & Ma, 2021). In addition, the stress variations and effective elastic property changes in our model can be more pronounced, when further energy dissipation mechanisms are introduced to both the fractures and the matrix.…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Variations Of the In Situ Stress Within Fau...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fracture constitutive behavior in this study is independent of time, which ignores the significant evolution of fracture deformation with time (Brantut et al, 2013;Scholz, 1968). If time-dependent fracture behavior is considered, it is expected to further promote stress rotation and weaken the rock mass frictional strength in a temporal sense (Zhang & Ma, 2021). In addition, the stress variations and effective elastic property changes in our model can be more pronounced, when further energy dissipation mechanisms are introduced to both the fractures and the matrix.…”
Section: Spatial-temporal Variations Of the In Situ Stress Within Fau...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the mechanical behavior of a frictional fracture under plane strain condition (Zhang & Ma, 2021) is extended to include elastic deformation. In particular, a complete constitutive law for the frictional fracture is derived under loading and unloading conditions, respectively, which is used to calculate the fracture-induced stress changes inside the multilayer model in Section 3.…”
Section: Constitutive Behavior Of Frictional Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This correlation corroborates the primary control of fault criticality on seismicity occurrence, but there remain some obstacles to predict the regional seismicity evolution. The fault criticality is a conditional scalar index based on the assumed probabilistic distributions of in-situ stress field, fault geometry, and frictional coefficient, which are quite heterogeneous and difficult to constrain (Lund Snee & Zoback, 2018;Ma et al, 2020;Shen et al, 2019;Walsh & Zoback, 2016;Zhang and Ma, 2021). Despite the possible deviation of the assumed parameter distributions from the realistic in-situ conditions, the first-order quantification of fault criticality is rather informative to estimate the faults' susceptibility to reactivation, particularly in the context of nearby reservoir impoundment.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correlation corroborates the primary control of fault criticality on seismicity occurrence, but there remain some obstacles to predict the regional seismicity evolution. The fault criticality is a conditional scalar index based on the assumed probabilistic distributions of in-situ stress field, fault geometry, and frictional coefficient, which are quite heterogeneous and difficult to constrain (Ma et al, 2020;Shen et al, 2019;Snee & Zoback, 2018;Walsh & Zoback, 2016;Zhang & Ma, 2021). Despite the possible deviation of the assumed parameter distributions from the realistic in-situ conditions, the first-order quantification of fault criticality is rather informative to estimate the faults' susceptibility to reactivation, particularly in the context of nearby reservoir impoundment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%