2002
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0291:gcocuc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global correlation of Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) sequences: Evidence for Milankovitch control on sea level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
127
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
127
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of long-term sea-level rise during the Cenomanian, therefore, was 3-8 m Myr −1 , which is well below the 30 m Myr −1 maximum imposed by tectonic as opposed to glacio-eustatic forcing. However, the amplitude of medium-to short-term sea-level change of 2-20 m estimated by Gale et al (2002), although less than the 50 m calculated by Sahagian et al (1996) and > 25 m determined by Miller et al (2003Miller et al ( , 2004, indicates rates of short-term sea-level change during the Cenomanian of 10-100 m Myr −1 . It is notable that the lower amplitude sea-level variation documented by Gale et al (2002) correlates well with the amplitude of variation displayed by the δ 13 C curve (Fig.…”
Section: A Eustatic Sea-levelcontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The rate of long-term sea-level rise during the Cenomanian, therefore, was 3-8 m Myr −1 , which is well below the 30 m Myr −1 maximum imposed by tectonic as opposed to glacio-eustatic forcing. However, the amplitude of medium-to short-term sea-level change of 2-20 m estimated by Gale et al (2002), although less than the 50 m calculated by Sahagian et al (1996) and > 25 m determined by Miller et al (2003Miller et al ( , 2004, indicates rates of short-term sea-level change during the Cenomanian of 10-100 m Myr −1 . It is notable that the lower amplitude sea-level variation documented by Gale et al (2002) correlates well with the amplitude of variation displayed by the δ 13 C curve (Fig.…”
Section: A Eustatic Sea-levelcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…15), but both the Sahagian et al (1996) and the Gale et al (2002) sea-level curves independently demonstrate a rise of 50 m through the Cenomanian, corresponding to a + 3 ‰ positive shift in δ 13 C values. Miller et al (2003Miller et al ( , 2004, on the other hand, estimated a sealevel rise of only 20 m through the stage but predicted higher sea-levels in the middle Cenomanian.…”
Section: A Eustatic Sea-levelmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It poses the problems for calibrations and the underlying uncertainties inherent in our simplified approach (Burgess and Wright, 2003;Warrlich et al, 2008;Clavera-Gispert et al, 2017). Nevertheless, our model represents a shift from the standard accommodation-forced geometrical models (Dalmasso et al, 2001;Gale et al, 2002;Burgess et al, 2006) where coral reef stratigraphy is controlled mainly by changes in sea level. Even if our approach is a simplification of natural processes, the simulated stratigraphic patterns are a sum of simultaneous, interacting tectonic, biological, physical and sedimentological processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%