2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9890-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gland and Zonal Segmentation of Prostate on T2W MR Images

Abstract: For many years, prostate segmentation on MR images concerned only the extraction of the entire gland. Currently, in the focal treatment era, there is a continuously increasing need for the separation of the different parts of the organ. In this paper, we propose an automatic segmentation method based on the use of T2W images and atlas images to segment the prostate and to isolate the peripheral and transition zones. The algorithm consists of two stages. First, the target image is registered with each zonal atl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure utilizes a large array of existing robust utilities in MIM for image normalization and deformable fusion. The segmentation results (DSC of 0.83) are comparable to previously reported in atlas-based approaches: DSC of 0.85 in Klein 15 ; 0.82 in Chilali 21 ; 0.87 in Cheng 19 ; 0.87 in Xie 18 ; 0.83 in Tian 28 ; and 0.87-0.88 in Korsager 20 . Note, DSC=0.83 in this work is calculated over the entire prostate, while some of the referenced studies, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure utilizes a large array of existing robust utilities in MIM for image normalization and deformable fusion. The segmentation results (DSC of 0.83) are comparable to previously reported in atlas-based approaches: DSC of 0.85 in Klein 15 ; 0.82 in Chilali 21 ; 0.87 in Cheng 19 ; 0.87 in Xie 18 ; 0.83 in Tian 28 ; and 0.87-0.88 in Korsager 20 . Note, DSC=0.83 in this work is calculated over the entire prostate, while some of the referenced studies, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Several promising automatic, semi-automatic and interactive approaches were evaluated, 12 including atlas-based segmentation techniques [13][14][15] . Because of the excellent depiction of the prostate and surrounding anatomy, the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and high spatial resolution, 12,16,17 T2-weighted MRI is the sequence of choice for building a prostate atlas 12,[18][19][20][21][22] . More recently, several studies provide also segmentation of the prostate zonal structures 21,[23][24][25] The presented approaches vary from model-based 26,27 , to atlasbased segmentation 15,[18][19][20][21]28 The goal of this work is to implement a robust procedure for prostate and prostate zones segmentation in a clinical imaging platform MIM (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chilali et al 27 proposed an atlas-based and c-means clustering for prostate and zonal segmentation and achieved Dice values of 0.81, 0.70, and 0.62 for the prostate, the transition zone, and peripheral zone, respectively. Tian et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ou and Davatzikos (2012); Klein et al (2008) multi-atlas based approaches were applied to the whole prostate segmentation. Although automatic whole prostate segmentation has already been addressed in the literature, very few works have been proposed for zonal segmentation (Chilali et al, 2016;Makni et al, 2014;Qiu et al, 2014;Toth et al, 2013) and none of them use multi-atlas based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%