2021
DOI: 10.5194/tc-15-2115-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glacier Image Velocimetry: an open-source toolbox for easy and rapid calculation of high-resolution glacier velocity fields

Abstract: Abstract. We present Glacier Image Velocimetry (GIV), an open-source and easy-to-use software toolkit for rapidly calculating high-spatial-resolution glacier velocity fields. Glacier ice velocity fields reveal flow dynamics, ice-flux changes, and (with additional data and modelling) ice thickness. Obtaining glacier velocity measurements over wide areas with field techniques is labour intensive and often associated with safety risks. The recent increased availability of high-resolution, short-repeat-time optica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, when the satellite images are high-pass filtered before computing the cross-correlation surface, the resulting velocity maps often display improved quality as represented by a low δ u value (Figure 4a). This observation aligns with several past studies (Dehecq et al, 2015;Fahnestock et al, 2016;Van Wyk de Vries and Wickert, 2021). The δ u values also decrease with increasing matching template size, a classic trade-off between spatial smoothing and noise (Ahn and Howat, 2011, Figure 4b).…”
Section: Intercomparisonsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, when the satellite images are high-pass filtered before computing the cross-correlation surface, the resulting velocity maps often display improved quality as represented by a low δ u value (Figure 4a). This observation aligns with several past studies (Dehecq et al, 2015;Fahnestock et al, 2016;Van Wyk de Vries and Wickert, 2021). The δ u values also decrease with increasing matching template size, a classic trade-off between spatial smoothing and noise (Ahn and Howat, 2011, Figure 4b).…”
Section: Intercomparisonsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since SNR correlates to the matching correctness and provides a good pixel-based quality assessment, many feature tracking tools generate a SNR map as part of the standard output along with the velocity grid, such as CARST (Zheng et al, 2019(Zheng et al, , 2021 and GIV (Van Wyk de Vries and Wickert, 2021). Ideally, we want to exclude incorrect matches from propagating to the derived velocity map and calculate uncertainties for correct matches.…”
Section: Defining Good Performance For Glacier Feature Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leprince et al, 2007), measuring glacier flow velocities (e.g. Bindschadler and Scambos, 1991;Heid and Kääb, 2012;Millan et al, 2019;Van Wyk de Vries and Wickert, 2021), and measuring landslide displacements (e.g. Behling et al, 2014;Lucieer et al, 2014;Manconi et al, 2018;Dai et al, 2020a;Dille et al, 2021).…”
Section: Remote-sensing Techniques 141 Feature Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used two different feature-tracking toolboxes: GIV (Van Wyk de Vries and Wickert, 2021) and AutoRIFT (Lei et al, 2021). Both GIV and AutoRIFT are based on three core components: a pre-processing module which applies one or more filters to images to enhance distinct surface features for tracking, a multipass 2D image correlator, and a post-processing module to identify and filter erroneous displacement values (Van Wyk de Vries and Wickert, 2021;Lei et al, 2021). The GIV toolbox is written in MATLAB and performs image cross correlation in the frequency domain, while AutoRIFT is written in python/C++ and performs the cross correlation in the spatial domain.…”
Section: Optical Feature Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation